Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a
recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "J" wrote in message ... I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. Most likely, your laminate would be trashed. Ceramic tile, sheet goods would have fared better. If the flood was bad enough, anything may have been damaged as water got under seams. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 0k6Ui.7851$BX2.3943@trndny09, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
Most likely, your laminate would be trashed. Ceramic tile, sheet goods would have fared better. If the flood was bad enough, anything may have been damaged as water got under seams. There are one or two laminate floors that use a synthetic (non-wood based) substrate. They're expensive and choice is limited but they are waterproof and would work in a kitchen. In my experience, spills and even floods are inevitable in the kitchen. It's only a matter of when, not if! And when it happens, you'll have a few minutes to mop it all up before your regular laminate floor is damaged, if not destroyed. I would choose a good floor tile every time but vinyl also works pretty well. Vinyl feels warmer and dropped items have a slightly soft landing. It's durable, waterproof and cheap too. Of course, many folks hate vinyl and if you're one of those you can just pass by that option. -- |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| | Malcolm Hoar "The more I practice, the luckier I get". | | Gary Player. | | http://www.malch.com/ Shpx gur PQN. | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Oct, 15:38, "J" wrote:
I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. The first question I'd ask myself is this one: "What are the odds that my kitchen is going to be flooded again? Take the number of catastrophic water heater leaks in a given year and divide it by the number of installed water heaters. I'm guessing the number is miniscule. Now, considering the fact that you've already been a victim, what are the odds that you are going to be a victim again? Some will say that the odds are the same as anybody else's since the failure rate is based on the water heater, not on the person, but I'd be willing to bet that you've seen the catastrophic water heater leak you're going to see in your lifetime. Then I'd ask myself: Do I want to limit my choices of flooring based on the extremely remote chance that my water heater is going to ruin it? Do I want to live in fear or am I willing to take the risk to enjoy my home as much as possible. If you choose to not to live with the risk, then you should take steps to protect everything else in the house that could be damaged by the leak. Next: Will my homeowner's insurance cover the damage? If so, why worry about it? And finally... What can I do to protect my home from a leaky water heater? Can I put a tray under it with a drain? Can I redirect the water from a (reasonable) leak so that it doesn't damage my floor? Can I relocate the device so as to eliminate the risk altogether? How can I limit the risk so I can live in a house that is finsihed in a manner that I find enjoyable? |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On 25 Oct, 15:38, "J" wrote: I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. The first question I'd ask myself is this one: "What are the odds that my kitchen is going to be flooded again? Take the number of catastrophic water heater leaks in a given year and divide it by the number of installed water heaters. And dishwashers, faucets and associated water pipes, icemaker lines and the list goes on. Kitchens suffer plenty of spills and floods, some minor and some major. I would never install flooring that wasn't waterproof in a kitchen, bathroom or laundry room. Floods happen! -- |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| | Malcolm Hoar "The more I practice, the luckier I get". | | Gary Player. | | http://www.malch.com/ Shpx gur PQN. | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 4:00 pm, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On 25 Oct, 15:38, "J" wrote: I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. The first question I'd ask myself is this one: "What are the odds that my kitchen is going to be flooded again? Take the number of catastrophic water heater leaks in a given year and divide it by the number of installed water heaters. I'm guessing the number is miniscule. Now, considering the fact that you've already been a victim, what are the odds that you are going to be a victim again? According to basic probability analysis, the odds are exactly the same as they were before the first flood. Unless you factor in that the WH leak was caused by the WH failing and now they have a new one. So, the odds of another failure are lower for a few years from the water heater itself failing again, but by the time the new heater is the age of the one that just went bad, the odds are back to exactly the same. For example, if the probablility of you getting struck by lightning is 1 in 100,000, and you get hit and survive, the probability of you getting hit again is exactly the same, 1 in 100,000. Many people have the misconception that the odds change, but they do not. Some will say that the odds are the same as anybody else's since the failure rate is based on the water heater, not on the person, but I'd be willing to bet that you've seen the catastrophic water heater leak you're going to see in your lifetime. So, what are you saying? That the failure rate is based on some given number of events per person over their lifetime instead of physical events? Then I'd ask myself: Do I want to limit my choices of flooring based on the extremely remote chance that my water heater is going to ruin it? Do I want to live in fear or am I willing to take the risk to enjoy my home as much as possible. If you choose to not to live with the risk, then you should take steps to protect everything else in the house that could be damaged by the leak. Next: Will my homeowner's insurance cover the damage? If so, why worry about it? And finally... What can I do to protect my home from a leaky water heater? Can I put a tray under it with a drain? Can I redirect the water from a (reasonable) leak so that it doesn't damage my floor? Can I relocate the device so as to eliminate the risk altogether? How can I limit the risk so I can live in a house that is finsihed in a manner that I find enjoyable? Yes, any water heater that is located where leakage will result in damage should have a pan with a drain routed to take any water to a safe dumping point. And a $10 water alarm, which you can set in the pan or on the floor. |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 5:58 pm, wrote:
On Oct 25, 4:00 pm, DerbyDad03 wrote: On 25 Oct, 15:38, "J" wrote: I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. The first question I'd ask myself is this one: "What are the odds that my kitchen is going to be flooded again? Take the number of catastrophic water heater leaks in a given year and divide it by the number of installed water heaters. I'm guessing the number is miniscule. Now, considering the fact that you've already been a victim, what are the odds that you are going to be a victim again? According to basic probability analysis, the odds are exactly the same as they were before the first flood. Unless you factor in that the WH leak was caused by the WH failing and now they have a new one. So, the odds of another failure are lower for a few years from the water heater itself failing again, but by the time the new heater is the age of the one that just went bad, the odds are back to exactly the same. For example, if the probablility of you getting struck by lightning is 1 in 100,000, and you get hit and survive, the probability of you getting hit again is exactly the same, 1 in 100,000. Many people have the misconception that the odds change, but they do not. Some will say that the odds are the same as anybody else's since the failure rate is based on the water heater, not on the person, but I'd be willing to bet that you've seen the catastrophic water heater leak you're going to see in your lifetime. -- So, what are you saying? That the failure rate is based on some given number of events per person over their lifetime instead of physical events? No, I'm saying exactly what you are saying. I fact, I already said it: "the failure rate is based on the water heater, not on the person". But I'd still be willing to bet that the OP has seen the last catastrophic water heater leak he's going to see in his lifetime. It's a bet - I'm willing to bet that based on the failure rate of water heaters, which will play out as they are supposed, that he won't be impacted again. I'm betting that there are enough other water heater owners out there that the risk is spread out pretty thinly. Again - it's a bet. Of course, it's a bet the OP has to be willing to take, since I don't really have a stake in his kitchen floor. :-) Then I'd ask myself: Do I want to limit my choices of flooring based on the extremely remote chance that my water heater is going to ruin it? Do I want to live in fear or am I willing to take the risk to enjoy my home as much as possible. If you choose to not to live with the risk, then you should take steps to protect everything else in the house that could be damaged by the leak. Next: Will my homeowner's insurance cover the damage? If so, why worry about it? And finally... What can I do to protect my home from a leaky water heater? Can I put a tray under it with a drain? Can I redirect the water from a (reasonable) leak so that it doesn't damage my floor? Can I relocate the device so as to eliminate the risk altogether? How can I limit the risk so I can live in a house that is finsihed in a manner that I find enjoyable? Yes, any water heater that is located where leakage will result in damage should have a pan with a drain routed to take any water to a safe dumping point. And a $10 water alarm, which you can set in the pan or on the floor.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:38:54 -0400, "J" wrote:
I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. You'll have more than water concerns with laminate. Kitchen chairs,tables and appliances can easily scratch wood flooring. |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J" wrote in message
... I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. Vinyl would withstand minor flooding as well as the subfloor prep and adhesive. Hardwoods would dlikely not fare so well. Tile is close to vinyl - enough standing water to affect the subfloor may damage tile mounted to it. Perhaps an alternate consideration might be a liner for the closet containing the water heater? If you feared a leak there, a structure similar to the base of a walk-in shower might be an answer at a fraction of the price. Ideally it would have a drain and connect to the grey water system. Even without a drain, it might buy you time in the event of a slow leak so that water is contained and you have time to deal with it. Improvise with a wash tub or visit the local recycling store. |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 6:22 pm, "G Wood" wrote:
"J" wrote in message ... I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. Vinyl would withstand minor flooding as well as the subfloor prep and adhesive. Hardwoods would dlikely not fare so well. Tile is close to vinyl - enough standing water to affect the subfloor may damage tile mounted to it. Perhaps an alternate consideration might be a liner for the closet containing the water heater? If you feared a leak there, a structure similar to the base of a walk-in shower might be an answer at a fraction of the price. Ideally it would have a drain and connect to the grey water system. Even without a drain, it might buy you time in the event of a slow leak so that water is contained and you have time to deal with it. Improvise with a wash tub or visit the local recycling store. They have those at the local home center and they are called pans that go under water heaters. They have an outlet that you can then plumb to a safe discharge location. Any WH where leakage could cause damage should have one and an alarm as well. Of course, that just eliminates one problem, though a major one, from a wood floor in a kitchen. There is still the dishwasher, sink, frig water line, etc that can leak. But usually those are less serious than a WH. |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Oct, 15:38, "J" wrote:
I had been leaning toward installing laminate flooring in our kitchen, but a recent incident tells me that this might not be a good choice: Our water heater resides in a closet that is part of the kitchen and during the middle of the night, a leak sprung up that flooded the kitchen. How well would laminate flooring recover from being flooded (or hardwood for that matter)? With the water heater basically in the same room and our washer is also in the kitchen, would it be more prudent to choose a different floor covering? Thanks. Coincedentally, I was watching Ask This Old House last night and Rich showcased various "leak protection devices" for water heaters, dishwashers, sinks and laundries. They ranged from the simple alarms that go off if the floor gets wet to some sophistcated devices that monitor the flow. One device uses a floor sensor, say in a pan under the HWH, wired to the cold inlet to shut off the water if the floor gets wet. Granted, you'd still have the water from the HWH to deal with, but it would limit the damage somewhat. If you can't get a pan under the HWH, they showed a rubber hose that can be used a dam to contain enough water to set of the device. This device could also be plumbed into a dishwasher or laundry system. Another very simple device was a braided hose with a mechanical valve in one end that slammed shut if the hose burst. He cut the hose with a bolt cutter and other than a quick spray of water, the hose did not leak. Great for dishwashers, sinks and laundries. Another device was for the laundry which included the water valves and a power outlet. Supposedly, as long as the washer was not drawing any current, the valves would stay shut so if a hose burst, the leak would be limited to the water in the hose. The assumption was also that you are always home when you do the laundry, so you'd know about a burst hose if the device was drawing current. I'm not sure about that one. My washer has an electronic display and although I've never tested it, I'm assuming it is drawing some current at all times. As soon as you touch any button or turn the knob, the display lights up, plus it remembers the options you chose the last time you used a given cycle, so I'm guessing it is "always on". That and the time delay means I don't have to be home to do laundry. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kitchen Faucet Choice? | Home Repair | |||
Is an Electric a Good Choice for Edging Dymondria? | Home Repair | |||
Is maple a safe long term choice for a kitchen? | UK diy | |||
Combi-Boiler Choice- ?Alpha any good | UK diy | |||
good choice for first-time plumbing repair? | Home Repair |