Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these
are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? Internet searches on this have not resulted in any material articles. Any comments/suggestions appreciated! |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Why not use the proper filter? An Aprilaire filter [5"] is an excellent
filter, and should be changed annually at a minimum. [Honeywell also makes a similar filter.] A 1" filter is not as efficient in removing material from the air and at best should be changed monthly. To save a few bucks by using something that requires more changes, is less efficient, and ends up being "Mickey Moused" in seems less appealing to me. -- Zyp wrote in message oups.com... I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? Internet searches on this have not resulted in any material articles. Any comments/suggestions appreciated! |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
How hard would it be to make some sort of adapter out of metal or wood
to take up the difference? I don't see why you can't use a normal 1" filter instead of a 5" filter. And if anything, I'd pass judgement on someone using the 5" filter as being overy paranoid or succeptable to marketing gimmicks. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
|
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
"Joseph Meehan" writes:
wrote: I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? You can use a cheap 1" filter. You likely should replace it more often could he use 4 or 5 1" filters? less adapter needed then. (I say 4, since the packaging might not be exactly 1") the ones further from the front will have less particulate. This may induce less flowrate if the 5" has the same amount of air resistance as 1 1" filter, though. -- May no harm befall you, flip Ich habe keine Ahnung was das bedeutet, oder vielleicht doch? In my email replace SeeEmmYou.EeeDeeYou with CMU.EDU |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Buy the correct filters on ebay and save a bunch, there are even clones that work as well and cost less. I paid extra to get that filter installed with my new hvac unit and really don't mind even at $36 once a year, but can get them for 1/2 that on the bay of E though I may have to buy more than one to get that price. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
ACTUALLY, there is a reason they are thicker. It's called a high efficiency
filter. I paid extra for that thick housing on mine. There's a reason. Use the proper filter and quit being a cheap skate. -- Steve Barker wrote in message ps.com... How hard would it be to make some sort of adapter out of metal or wood to take up the difference? I don't see why you can't use a normal 1" filter instead of a 5" filter. And if anything, I'd pass judgement on someone using the 5" filter as being overy paranoid or succeptable to marketing gimmicks. |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
|
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
CJT wrote:
wrote: I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? Internet searches on this have not resulted in any material articles. Any comments/suggestions appreciated! Perhaps you could use 5 of the 1" variety, and cycle them (replace the front one and add a new one to the back whenever the pack needs refreshing). Not good. The additional air resistance could damage your air handler. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Joseph Meehan wrote:
CJT wrote: wrote: I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? Internet searches on this have not resulted in any material articles. Any comments/suggestions appreciated! Perhaps you could use 5 of the 1" variety, and cycle them (replace the front one and add a new one to the back whenever the pack needs refreshing). Not good. The additional air resistance could damage your air handler. That assumes there IS "additional air resistance." I don't think that has been demonstrated. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
CJT wrote:
Joseph Meehan wrote: CJT wrote: wrote: I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? Internet searches on this have not resulted in any material articles. Any comments/suggestions appreciated! Perhaps you could use 5 of the 1" variety, and cycle them (replace the front one and add a new one to the back whenever the pack needs refreshing). Not good. The additional air resistance could damage your air handler. That assumes there IS "additional air resistance." I don't think that has been demonstrated. While it would depend on the specific filters, I is a very good bet it would increase the resistance unless you were using some very cheap poor quality filters, and maybe even for those. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Using 5, 1" filters wont work, you wont have enough air pass and will
overheat your furnace and get little air. A 5" media lasts, allows much less 1st time pollutant pass through. Use what its designed for a 5" unit. |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
m Ransley wrote:
Using 5, 1" filters wont work, you wont have enough air pass and will overheat your furnace and get little air. A 5" media lasts, allows much less 1st time pollutant pass through. Use what its designed for a 5" unit. I built a wooden frame that fit in my 5 inch media slot and which accepted standard one inch media. The problem with 5 inch is that it "looks" dirty just as fast as one inch and nobody will tell you "for certain" how long you should use the filter before replacing and the HVAC crowd is always warning us about not letting the filter get too clogged. Well if you don't have a pressure meter how do you tell this? With a three to five dollar one inch filter I can take the attitude "if in doubt replace it". That gets pretty expensive with five inch media. The stuff that came in my furnace was over forty dollars a pop. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
My April Air media lasts over 1 year, your 1-5$ thing will be inferior
in operation. I cant believe anybody would even consider doing what you plan. Your furnace -AC coil is what you are trying to protect to not loose efficiency from crapping it up. You have a superior system , use it. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Joseph Meehan wrote:
CJT wrote: Joseph Meehan wrote: CJT wrote: wrote: I have a furnace built for a 25"x20"x5" filter. I've discovered these are *really* expensive compared to the 1" filters. Is there any strong reason not to use a 1" filter with some sort of space adapater in this application? Internet searches on this have not resulted in any material articles. Any comments/suggestions appreciated! Perhaps you could use 5 of the 1" variety, and cycle them (replace the front one and add a new one to the back whenever the pack needs refreshing). Not good. The additional air resistance could damage your air handler. That assumes there IS "additional air resistance." I don't think that has been demonstrated. While it would depend on the specific filters, I is a very good bet it would increase the resistance unless you were using some very cheap poor quality filters, and maybe even for those. The thing about the 5" filters is that they start at roughly the same back pressure as a good 3M filter, but load up VERY slowly because of the VAST increase in surface area. The 3M will be excessively loading the fan in under 90 days, in many cases, under 30 days, costs $15-$20 and has to be replaced 4 or more times a year. The 5"filter won't get to the same back pressure as the 3M for 9 months to 12 months or longer. Spend $45 once a year and trap more dirt and let your furnace run more efficiently, or spend $80 a year... |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:14:21 GMT, Rick Brandt wrote:
The problem with 5 inch is that it "looks" dirty just as fast as one inch and nobody will tell you "for certain" how long you should use the filter before replacing and the HVAC crowd is always warning us about not letting the filter get too clogged. Well if you don't have a pressure meter how do you tell this? Build a meter? Buy: two or three feet of clear vinyl tubing (small diameter) two fittings for tubing to threaded (bulkhead fittings would be best, but more costly) mount both fittings into sheet metal duct work, one on each side of filter -- upstream and downstream air flow. (Idea is that air handler can suck air thru them.) Make sure fittings are close enough together that tubing will hang down in a loose loop between them. Fill tubing about 1/4 to 1/2 way with water. (Could add some food coloring to make the level easier to see.) Connect both ends of tubing to fittings. (Easiest with air handler OFF.) Note water level (might want to mark it) with air handler off. It should be equal on both legs. Note water level with air handler on. With even a clean filter the legs will likely now be offset a little bit (downstream leg higher). Water will move closer and closer to the downstream side of the filter as filter restriction increases. Too much restriction and you will have to refill the tube. (If you can find a little floating ball that will just barely freely fit inside the tubing, put it in the downstream side and it will prevent most of the water sucking out. Another ball on the upstream side makes it easy to see water levels.) sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
"sylvan butler" wrote in message rnal... On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:14:21 GMT, Rick Brandt wrote: The problem with 5 inch is that it "looks" dirty just as fast as one inch and nobody will tell you "for certain" how long you should use the filter before replacing and the HVAC crowd is always warning us about not letting the filter get too clogged. Well if you don't have a pressure meter how do you tell this? Build a meter? Buy: two or three feet of clear vinyl tubing (small diameter) two fittings for tubing to threaded (bulkhead fittings would be best, but more costly) mount both fittings into sheet metal duct work, one on each side of filter -- upstream and downstream air flow. (Idea is that air handler can suck air thru them.) Make sure fittings are close enough together that tubing will hang down in a loose loop between them. Fill tubing about 1/4 to 1/2 way with water. (Could add some food coloring to make the level easier to see.) Connect both ends of tubing to fittings. (Easiest with air handler OFF.) Note water level (might want to mark it) with air handler off. It should be equal on both legs. Note water level with air handler on. With even a clean filter the legs will likely now be offset a little bit (downstream leg higher). Water will move closer and closer to the downstream side of the filter as filter restriction increases. Too much restriction and you will have to refill the tube. (If you can find a little floating ball that will just barely freely fit inside the tubing, put it in the downstream side and it will prevent most of the water sucking out. Another ball on the upstream side makes it easy to see water levels.) sdb That's a pretty good idea really. Although if you didn't want to mess with water and such I think you could do the same with a couple of cheap barometers one on each side. |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:39:48 -0700, Eigenvector wrote:
"sylvan butler" wrote in message rnal... Water will move closer and closer to the downstream side of the filter as filter restriction increases. Too much restriction and you will have to refill the tube. That's a pretty good idea really. Although if you didn't want to mess with water and such I think you could do the same with a couple of cheap barometers one on each side. The advantage to the water-in-tube approach, is it is self-calibrating and balancing for filter restriction. A pair of cheap barometers might work, but there may be issues... 1) how do you attach them to measure the ductwork? Look for ones that have a fitting for tubing on their pressure bubble, and you'll still need the tubing fittings in your ductwork. 2) Look at all the cheap barometers in the store. Pick two that read the same. Suprising how many don't. Or just use one. 3) What range and precision will they read? We only need relative accuracy, but we need moderately high precision at one end of a large offset from ambient pressure in order see the effect of filter restriction. sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Or -
Honeywell sells a "filter" change meter. [It is a simple "flag" meter that attaches to the return air plenum.] By measuring the static it can be adjusted to "flag" when the draw becomes excessive. Cute little gadget. -- Zyp "sylvan butler" wrote in message rnal... On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:39:48 -0700, Eigenvector wrote: "sylvan butler" wrote in message rnal... Water will move closer and closer to the downstream side of the filter as filter restriction increases. Too much restriction and you will have to refill the tube. That's a pretty good idea really. Although if you didn't want to mess with water and such I think you could do the same with a couple of cheap barometers one on each side. The advantage to the water-in-tube approach, is it is self-calibrating and balancing for filter restriction. A pair of cheap barometers might work, but there may be issues... 1) how do you attach them to measure the ductwork? Look for ones that have a fitting for tubing on their pressure bubble, and you'll still need the tubing fittings in your ductwork. 2) Look at all the cheap barometers in the store. Pick two that read the same. Suprising how many don't. Or just use one. 3) What range and precision will they read? We only need relative accuracy, but we need moderately high precision at one end of a large offset from ambient pressure in order see the effect of filter restriction. sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:30:34 -0700, Zephyr wrote:
Honeywell sells a "filter" change meter. [It is a simple "flag" meter that attaches to the return air plenum.] By measuring the static it can be adjusted to "flag" when the draw becomes excessive. Cute little gadget. Sounds interesting. Couldn't find it. Have a link? sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
sylvan butler wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:30:34 -0700, Zephyr wrote: Honeywell sells a "filter" change meter. [It is a simple "flag" meter that attaches to the return air plenum.] By measuring the static it can be adjusted to "flag" when the draw becomes excessive. Cute little gadget. Sounds interesting. Couldn't find it. Have a link? sdb www.filters-now.com sells one from GeneralAire.$14.99. Find it near the bottom of the Honeywell Whole House Filters page. |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:26:01 GMT, Robert Gammon wrote:
sylvan butler wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:30:34 -0700, Zephyr wrote: Honeywell sells a "filter" change meter. [It is a simple "flag" meter that attaches to the return air plenum.] Sounds interesting. Couldn't find it. Have a link? www.filters-now.com sells one from GeneralAire.$14.99. Find it near the bottom of the Honeywell Whole House Filters page. http://www.filters-now.com/products/dhw.html That's darn slick. sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
sylvan butler wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:26:01 GMT, Robert Gammon wrote: sylvan butler wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:30:34 -0700, Zephyr wrote: Honeywell sells a "filter" change meter. [It is a simple "flag" meter that attaches to the return air plenum.] Sounds interesting. Couldn't find it. Have a link? www.filters-now.com sells one from GeneralAire.$14.99. Find it near the bottom of the Honeywell Whole House Filters page. http://www.filters-now.com/products/dhw.html That's darn slick. sdb Unfortunately I have no ducting between the filter and the furnace cold air return. The filter box is mounted immediately to the furnace's side. Would the probe for that thing work if it were just placed inside the squirrel-cage area of the blower? |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Rick Brandt wrote:
sylvan butler wrote: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:26:01 GMT, Robert Gammon wrote: sylvan butler wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:30:34 -0700, Zephyr wrote: Honeywell sells a "filter" change meter. [It is a simple "flag" meter that attaches to the return air plenum.] Sounds interesting. Couldn't find it. Have a link? www.filters-now.com sells one from GeneralAire.$14.99. Find it near the bottom of the Honeywell Whole House Filters page. http://www.filters-now.com/products/dhw.html That's darn slick. sdb Unfortunately I have no ducting between the filter and the furnace cold air return. The filter box is mounted immediately to the furnace's side. Would the probe for that thing work if it were just placed inside the squirrel-cage area of the blower? Yes, when HVAC contractors installed my new unit,they tapped into the case to measure pressure drop, then sealed the hole. I see no reason why you can't do the same thing. Make sure that the fan can't draw air around your probe. Seal the opening well. |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to Rick Brandt, Allie wrote:
Thank you. I too have the 5" slot for the filter on my new ac unit. Had I known how expensive those dang 5" filters were, I never would've gotten it. I want to use 1 or 2" filters too, with a rigged system to keep it in place. Can you post pics of how you made yours? -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to m Ransley, Allie wrote:
My filter is black after one month. Will never last a year. Theyre $30 each! Didn't know it would be so expensive. Bet you would "rig" it too If you had to pay that every month for a 5" filter. -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 4:44:04 PM UTC-4, Allie wrote:
replying to m Ransley, Allie wrote: My filter is black after one month. Will never last a year. Theyre $30 each! Didn't know it would be so expensive. Bet you would "rig" it too If you had to pay that every month for a 5" filter. -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm That thread is ten years old and Mr. Ransley hasn't been heard from in a very long time. But maybe you can't see how old posts are because your house is full of smoke and dirty air. It seems it would have to be to turn a new 5" filter dirty in just a month. I easily go 2 years on mine. |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:41:47 -0400, Ralph Mowery
wrote: One thing that may help is that we never open the windows. As the wife and I are both sensitive to pollen, we tend not to want much outside air in the house. Guess where the air in your house comes from? (Unless you have a company deliver "inside air" once a week.....). |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to Steve Barker LT, Allie wrote:
Not a matter of being a cheap skate. I also have the 5" slot in my new ac unit. I have to change the filter every month. That's 30-40$ a month. Really pricey. Installer told me to change every 3-6 months. Can't afford that every single month. So I'm trying the 2" ones with a frame under it. What would you do? -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to trader_4, Allie wrote:
My house is not smoke filled. I for some reason it's dusty. Could be the florida humidity. I have 3 dogs. 2 years? Wow. You're lucky. -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to Ralph Mowery, Allie wrote:
My house inside is not dirty. Non smoker. Even installer can't figure why it gets so dirty so fast. Can't afford those filters every month. Regret getting this new unit with the big filter box. Going to try the 2" filter. Theyre bad enough. $70 for 4. -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to Steve Barker LT, Allie wrote:
Not a matter of being a cheap skate. I also have the 5" slot in my new ac unit. I have to change the filter every month. That's 30-40$ a month. Really pricey. Installer told me to change every 3-6 months. Can't afford that every single month. So I'm trying the 2" ones with a frame under it. What would you do? -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Allie pretended :
replying to Steve Barker LT, Allie wrote: Not a matter of being a cheap skate. I also have the 5" slot in my new ac unit. I have to change the filter every month. That's 30-40$ a month. Really pricey. Installer told me to change every 3-6 months. Can't afford that every single month. So I'm trying the 2" ones with a frame under it. What would you do? Taking someone else's advice, he decided to wait eleven years to see if it corrected itself. He's still got one year left. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 8:26:46 AM UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
Allie pretended : replying to Steve Barker LT, Allie wrote: Not a matter of being a cheap skate. I also have the 5" slot in my new ac unit. I have to change the filter every month. That's 30-40$ a month. Really pricey. Installer told me to change every 3-6 months. Can't afford that every single month. So I'm trying the 2" ones with a frame under it. What would you do? Taking someone else's advice, he decided to wait eleven years to see if it corrected itself. He's still got one year left. along the lines of a gauge to keep an eye on things, I think it is a good idea to buy two probe thermometers and have them more or less permanently stuck into the ducts, one before the heater and one after. Put a mark at the normal inlet and outlet temperature readings and check them regularly. If the before and after readings are normal, that is a pretty good indication that your system is operating normally. Works for AC as well. You can get one for the flue as well but of course it will need a higher range. mark |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
|
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
trader_4 wrote: But maybe you can't see how old posts are because your house is full of smoke and dirty air. Arrogant little prick aren't you? https://disqus.com/by/disqus_9reYnilCVH/ |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
replying to FromTheRafters, Allie wrote:
Ok so I didn't notice his post was from 2006..let's move on. Can a 2" work with an adapter? Need help, not scarcaism. And I'm a woman, not a man. -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:14:05 AM UTC-4, Allie wrote:
replying to FromTheRafters, Allie wrote: Ok so I didn't notice his post was from 2006..let's move on. Can a 2" work with an adapter? Need help, not scarcaism. And I'm a woman, not a man. -- for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-5-155883-.htm How can anyone answer a general question like that? There are many manufacturers of filter housings and filters and many sizes. In theory you would think you could fabricate some kind of holder to get a thinner filter in there. Or maybe there is a size that goes right in. Have a measuring tape? But what it takes is going to depend on what exactly you have. Also, realize that you're going to live with more dirt getting through and/or the filter getting clogged faster. Those 5" media trap finer particles, but they also have much greater surface area. |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Use 1" furnace filter instead of 5" ?
Allie m wrote:
Ok so I didn't notice his post was from 2006..let's move on. Can a 2" work with an adapter? Need help, not scarcaism. And I'm a woman, not a man. The filter material is fan folded, so by using a thinner filter, you are reducing the surface area available for air to flow through. The net effect is that dust will restrict airflow much faster, and require changing far more often. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
furnace filter efficiency impact | Home Repair | |||
Usual water filter | Home Repair | |||
gas furnace with no replaceable filter? | Home Repair | |||
My furnace filter has no dust, why? | Woodworking | |||
Custom furnace filter | Home Ownership |