The patient is a Whirlpool top loader, circa 1989. I've had no problems with
it in the past; it has been a solid performer.

Recently the agitation is clearly reduced from its normal behavior. The
normal setting will agitate the clothes, but less vigorously than before. The
delicate setting barely jostles the clothing. And I don't know about the
permapress setting; I never use it.

While it is agitating a load, I can easily twist the center post with the
agitation vanes in either direction with minimal resistance.

A little bit of internet investigation leads to discussions of the "dawgs".
(Gotta love yet another instance of colorful terminology in washer lingo!)
But before I start tearing into the machine, it certainly can't hurt to ask
the experts here if that's a likely failure point, or whether I should start
with a different assumption.

Thanks for any advice.

Art

Mine wore out as you described.
A easy fix once you do it.
The parts are inexpensive.

--
Remove -NOSPAM- to contact me.

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:30:29 GMT, (Arthur
Shapiro) wrote:

The patient is a Whirlpool top loader, circa 1989. I've had no problems with
it in the past; it has been a solid performer.

Recently the agitation is clearly reduced from its normal behavior. The
normal setting will agitate the clothes, but less vigorously than before. The
delicate setting barely jostles the clothing. And I don't know about the
permapress setting; I never use it.

While it is agitating a load, I can easily twist the center post with the
agitation vanes in either direction with minimal resistance.

Loose belt (assuming there is a belt. I think I'm getting OldTimer's
Disease.) I'm using the same belt since 1979, but there's only one of
me, and I don't do much laundry.

A little bit of internet investigation leads to discussions of the "dawgs".
(Gotta love yet another instance of colorful terminology in washer lingo!)
But before I start tearing into the machine, it certainly can't hurt to ask
the experts here if that's a likely failure point, or whether I should start
with a different assumption.

Thanks for any advice.

Art

In our case, the Whirlpool washer (built '01) would spin only if the tub
was empty. At first I didn't think it spun at all, but when the tech
came to look at it he put it into the spin cycle with an empty tub and
it started to spin! When he applied pressure with his hand to the top
ring, it stopped. Something was slipping. Dunno if it was a belt or a
gear, but it was quiet.

He ended up replacing the transmission. Good thing we had bought the
extra 4 year warranty :-)

Arthur Shapiro wrote:
The patient is a Whirlpool top loader, circa 1989. I've had no problems with
it in the past; it has been a solid performer.

Recently the agitation is clearly reduced from its normal behavior. The
normal setting will agitate the clothes, but less vigorously than before. The
delicate setting barely jostles the clothing. And I don't know about the
permapress setting; I never use it.

While it is agitating a load, I can easily twist the center post with the
agitation vanes in either direction with minimal resistance.

A little bit of internet investigation leads to discussions of the "dawgs".
(Gotta love yet another instance of colorful terminology in washer lingo!)
But before I start tearing into the machine, it certainly can't hurt to ask
the experts here if that's a likely failure point, or whether I should start
with a different assumption.

Thanks for any advice.

Art