claudel wrote:
In article ,

Some meddling foreign dweeb, posing as Ian St. John
cried the blues into too many newsgroups:

Got anything meaningful to say?


claudel wrote:
In article ,
Some whining **** posting as Ian St. John
mournfully bleated:

Some whinging asshole calling himeself "Bob" twittered:

"claudel" wrote in message
...


Actually, it is long overdue. Perhaps they're waiting till after
the pending election victory.

Victory????

From dictionary.com.

vic·to·r
n. pl. vic·to·ries
1. Defeat of an enemy or opponent.

2. Success in a struggle against difficulties or an obstacle.

You presume a 'victory' over reality, truth, and honor? I see.

You presume much. I provided a link to a dictionary.

And showed that you don't understand real victories.




3. The state of having triumphed.

Triump over adversity is a good thing. Triump over democracy is not.

Triump?

Well, not yet, and maybe not ever. Kerry has the momentum.
http://www.econ.umn.edu/~amoro/Research/presprobs.html

and it has been building day by day. For Bush to pull an end run would be a
stretch though I expect he will try either delaying the election with
another 'terrorism alert' or rigging the election.




a _whole_ bunch of boring, whining crap deleted

I am merely stating the facts. They offer few other conclusions
which you seem to recognise which is why you avoid trying to rebut
it. As to boredom, that it the natural state of the unexamined mind
such as your own.


Facts?

Even though you are not American, this fits...

http://tinyurl.com/4mmjl

Whatever. Obviously you have no serious rebuttal.



As some lefturd once said:

This mean that you are a rightard? I guess this is the closest you
come to a rational discussion on the matter.


"By Any Means Necessary"

That is the state of 'democracy' in the U.S. all right. We thought
that the worst happened in 2000. Now they will eclipse that without
even buying votes, intimidating voters, screwing up the voter lists,
voting the graveyard, etc. Now it can be done conveniently by the
push of a button.

"The Ends Justify the Means..."
some other lefturd.


Thanks for confirming the state of decay in the founding principles.

Ummmm, whose founding principles?

You skipped civics classes?



Claude

The majority of voters voted for Gore. Yeah, I know how
the electorial college works, but that did not come into play
any more than the popular vote. The chimp was appointed.

Didn't Clinton only get something like 43% of the popular vote?

In article ,
Yet another net.loon posing as Ian St. John snivelled:

claudel wrote:
In article ,

Some meddling foreign dweeb, posing as Ian St. John
cried the blues into too many newsgroups:

Got anything meaningful to say?

Sure. I'm impressed with you left-wing cretinoids getting a slight
verification of your miserable and useless existence by crossposting
sophomoric and simplistic political drivel into irrelevant newsgroups
frequented by disinterested persons. That's something that has never
occurred before.


claudel wrote:
In article ,
Some whining **** posting as Ian St. John
mournfully bleated:

Some whinging asshole calling himeself "Bob" twittered:

"claudel" wrote in message
...


Actually, it is long overdue. Perhaps they're waiting till after
the pending election victory.

Victory????

From dictionary.com.

vic·to·r
n. pl. vic·to·ries
1. Defeat of an enemy or opponent.

2. Success in a struggle against difficulties or an obstacle.

You presume a 'victory' over reality, truth, and honor? I see.

You presume much. I provided a link to a dictionary.

And showed that you don't understand real victories.

Whatever you say, junior.





3. The state of having triumphed.

Triump over adversity is a good thing. Triump over democracy is not.

Triump?

Well, not yet, and maybe not ever. Kerry has the momentum.
http://www.econ.umn.edu/~amoro/Research/presprobs.html

and it has been building day by day. For Bush to pull an end run would be a
stretch though I expect he will try either delaying the election with
another 'terrorism alert' or rigging the election.


That will probably not be needed, but

"The Ends Justify the Means..."

and

"By Any Means Necessary"



a _whole_ bunch of boring, whining crap deleted

I am merely stating the facts. They offer few other conclusions
which you seem to recognise which is why you avoid trying to rebut
it. As to boredom, that it the natural state of the unexamined mind
such as your own.


Facts?

Even though you are not American, this fits...

http://tinyurl.com/4mmjl

Whatever. Obviously you have no serious rebuttal.

To what?



Thanks for confirming the state of decay in the founding principles.

Ummmm, whose founding principles?

You skipped civics classes?

I skipped a lot of classes. I was never much on educration.

Too many whining lefturds with a lifetime death grip on the public teat.

I was just mildly curious as to exactly whose "founding principles"
you have been crying about.


Claude

"mark" wrote in message
...
Didn't Clinton only get something like 43% of the popular vote?

Yes. It's called a "plurality", but it differs from what happened in 2000.

--
Kevin
-=#=-
www.freerepublic.com

wrote:
If Bush had his way most of us would own homes made of cardboard.

What? You think that real wood grows on trees.. ?? ;-)

Not that is has to do with Bush so much as the Right wing agenda, and
corporations which have taken fascism "multinational' and 'above' local
national level government'. The real result is an increasing level of income
disparity. The value of the 'idle class' wastrels are going up while the
'working poor' are becoming little more than captive slaves. I mean that
this is the 'ultimate purpose' of capitalism, isn't it?? To increase the
wealth of the capitalists? Do you think they are driven by altruism and
caring for those 'left behind'?

On 17 Oct 2004 10:22:46 -0700, in misc.consumers.house
(Tamara) wrote:

He'd be particularly talented behind the waffle iron!!

"davefr" wrote in message
m...
He'd be particularly talented behind the waffle iron!!

Who? Duh-bya?