Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
Hello,
I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed. I am buying a property that he (my agent) did not originally show me. I am trying to decide what to pay him. Any advice or perspective is appreciated, particularly if you or someone you know has had experience dealing with a similar situation and you knew the outcome of that scenario. More details: Let's see, where to start... My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical 2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). This works out to be $2937. This is significantly more then I expected to pay per our "gentlemen's agreement" I detail below. I had an amount of $1000 or less in my head. I'm sure that this agent would be very unhappy with me if I paid him $1000 or less. Unfortunately, the agent and I never discussed any numbers or percentages or set any other quantitative expectations when we made our "gentlemen's agreement." I'm realizing now that this was a key mistake on my part. All my friends and real-estate experienced people I've talked to thus far strongly feel that I should be paying this agent little if anything. A few of my friends said that they have found properties outside of what their agent had shown them and not paid their agent a dime. I am a 2nd-time buyer; I have previously purchased and sold a property in downtown Chicago; this property sold for $250k back in spring of 2002. (I sold it back then because I moved to Colorado...and now I'm back in Chicago and want to own a place again.) Even more details: I have been in the market, since early January, to buy a property for myself to live in somewhere in Chicago. A friend of mine happened to be selling his condo at the same time. He offered to sell me his place prior to listing it with his agent, at a price less then what he would list it if I didn't buy it. The place met all my requirements, and the price seemed somewhat reasonable, but I wasn't sure. I decided to employ an agent to see what else was available on the market. The agent and I orally made a "gentlemen's" agreement wherein I would pay him (the agent) standard commission (2.5% of the sale) if I bought a property that he introduced to me, and something substantially less then that if I bought the original property owned by my friend. I took my agent to visit the property being sold by my friend to have him evaluate its worth and to show him what I liked. (I also wrote a substantial document outlining my real-estate goals and preferences and requirements.) Since this agent also has an appraiser's license, I gave him the offer, if he agreed that my deal on my friend's property was good enough, to do a formal appraisal right there on the spot and start the process of my friend and I cutting a deal...and I would pay this agent the same amount I would for an appraiser's fee (even if that wouldn't be the last formal appraisal done). My agent advised me to look at other properties. After a significant search that involved approximately 10-12 property visits spread over 2 different showing days, my agent and I decided that the original property being sold by my friend was the best property available for me and my requirements. We also agreed that the $235k asking price my friend had was competitive and reasonable. I have decided to not seek any help from my agent for any further work with my purchase of my property (the original property I found myself through my friend). I am arranging all the lawyer, inspector, etc work to close the sale myself. I am not comfortable paying the $2900 my agent seeks. Furthermore, it may be difficult or impossible for me to drive this expense into my mortgage loan, because my seller is not that interested in doing it. This makes for a considerable out-of-pocket expense for me. All in all, I'm fairly unhappy. On the flip side, I am quite sensitive to honoring my agreement with this agent. He seems good, and I was considering having a long-term relationship with this gentlemen. I have to admit that I'm not yet certain that I am as interested in a long-term bond with agent after these discussions have been as uncomfortable for me as they have been thus far. Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much for any help, -Matt -- Remove the obvious text (including the dash) to email me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
It seems "Matt" wrote in misc.consumers:
I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed. I am buying a property that he (my agent) did not originally show me. I am trying to decide what to pay him. Any advice or perspective is appreciated, particularly if you or someone you know has had experience dealing with a similar situation and you knew the outcome of that scenario. What does your contract say? -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com "An expense does not have to be required to be considered necessary." -- IRS Form 1040 line 23 instructions |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:11:27 -0500, Stan Brown
wrote: What does your contract say? There is no written contract. Sorry I did not make that more clear earlier. -Matt -- Remove the obvious text (including the dash) to email me. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
It seems "Matt" wrote in misc.consumers:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:11:27 -0500, Stan Brown wrote: What does your contract say? There is no written contract. Sorry I did not make that more clear earlier. Then you need to consult a local lawyer. The real estate agent is claiming thousands of dollars in commissions, right? A letter from a lawyer should put an end to that relatively cheaply, or if in fact you do owe money your lawyer will tell you how much and provide a release form for the agent to sign. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com "An expense does not have to be required to be considered necessary." -- IRS Form 1040 line 23 instructions |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:50:43 GMT, Matt
wrote: My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical 2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). This works out to be $2937. This is significantly more then I expected to pay per our "gentlemen's agreement" I detail below. You sure don't know how to sort out relevant facts. What you did two years ago or what friends told you or what the price was then or is now, etc have nothing to do with your question. Get to the issues man. What did you sign? In real estate the only pertinent conditions are those in writing and signed by both parties. So what did you agree to do in writing? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
The issue you may be seeking is that there is no written agreement;
I'm sorrry I did not clarify that earlier (but it is what I meant when I wrote that we had only an "oral, gentlemen's agreement." I think the property's selling price does seem to be pertinent. -Matt On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:48:19 GMT, doubter wrote: You sure don't know how to sort out relevant facts. What you did two years ago or what friends told you or what the price was then or is now, etc have nothing to do with your question. Get to the issues man. What did you sign? In real estate the only pertinent conditions are those in writing and signed by both parties. So what did you agree to do in writing? -- Remove the obvious text (including the dash) to email me. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
M Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated.
M Thanks very much for any help, I don't see why you are so shy to tell the agent what you feel is fair amount. The agreement was oral; there's nothing in writing; he feels it should be 50% of the normal commission; you feel differently. Why not to sit down and settle on some middle ground. His position is no better than yours, as far as there was no written agreement. I'm also surprised that you make that arrangement at all. In Illinois the buyer usually does not pay the agent anything, it's the seller who does (through his agent, sho shares the commission). When I was buying a property one year ago, I worked with several agents, each showed me several properties, but eventually I bought just one, and only one agent got his commission - from the seller; not a penny from me. It's their normal way of work, and they are prepared for the fact that not every perspective buyer becomes a real one. I'm sure that if tomorrow I want to buy another property, they all will be happy to work with me again. With this in mind, the arrangement that you pay him even if you indeed buy the property he found, looks unfair (most likely, he would get the money from the seller as well); but the arrangement to pay him for the property he did not even find, looks like a complete nonsense. regards |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
"bat" wrote in news:cm2Tb.200170$xy6.1027463@attbi_s02:
M Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated. M Thanks very much for any help, I don't see why you are so shy to tell the agent what you feel is fair amount. The agreement was oral; there's nothing in writing; he feels it should be 50% of the normal commission; you feel differently. Why not to sit down and settle on some middle ground. His position is no better than yours, as far as there was no written agreement. I'm also surprised that you make that arrangement at all. In Illinois the buyer usually does not pay the agent anything, it's the seller who does (through his agent, sho shares the commission). When I was buying a property one year ago, I worked with several agents, each showed me several properties, but eventually I bought just one, and only one agent got his commission - from the seller; not a penny from me. It's their normal way of work, and they are prepared for the fact that not every perspective buyer becomes a real one. I'm sure that if tomorrow I want to buy another property, they all will be happy to work with me again. With this in mind, the arrangement that you pay him even if you indeed buy the property he found, looks unfair (most likely, he would get the money from the seller as well); but the arrangement to pay him for the property he did not even find, looks like a complete nonsense. Did the agent do anything to help you with the purchase of the house? If not, I wouldn't think you'd owe anything. Several times in the past, I've used multiple agents from different offices to help find a home to purchase (I had a limited amount of time to look while relocating for work). Different agents covered different areas, or days when another agent wasn't available. None of them were particularly happy about the situation, but then, the process isn't about making the RE agents happy :-) In the end, the agent who showed me the house I bought got the commission, and the others got nothing. That's the way the business works, and a RE agent is never guaranteed to make a sale with any particular buyer, regardless of how much time and effort they spend with/for the buyer. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 08:00:08 GMT, "bat" wrote:
M Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated. M Thanks very much for any help, I don't see why you are so shy to tell the agent what you feel is fair amount. The agreement was oral; there's nothing in writing; he feels it should be 50% of the normal commission; you feel differently. Why not to sit down and settle on some middle ground. His position is no better than yours, as far as there was no written agreement. Well put. This usenet thread is part of my work/research in advance of a sit-down-and-settle discussion to reach an agreement. I'm trying to gather all potential objective facts and relevant subjective perspectives, and so far I'm quite pleased with all the responses I'm getting. This is just the kind of stuff I sought. In the end, I'm trying to educate myself to make an informed counter-proposal to my agent. I don't see why you are so shy to tell the agent what you feel is fair amount. Part of this is that I'm extremely sensitive when it comes to honoring any sort of agreement. I suppose it's a morality/karma thing. Additionally, this agent is also an agent for some friends of mine, and I don't care to be spreading around a bad reputation; however, I probably should realize that many of things are beyond my control, particularly if people are not willing to evaluate the facts of the situation. In the end, I suspect the most-powerful approach to this negotiation will be to empathize with my agent as well as possible. ie, sit down and talk with him and state what it seems to be like coming from his position. Basically, take his side and truly try to understand where he is coming from. Argue the "devil's advocate" and use debate-club tactics, if you will. This probably get's me at least 2 things: 1) a better understanding of his perspective, and 2) more trust from the agent if he truly believes I understand his perspective. When/if I have achieved this, I suspect that he will be much more willing to listen to my side of the story (not to say that he isn't now--I haven't presented much, and am waiting to do so only to gather more info...hence this thread.) Alas, I suppose the above description applies to most any negotiation. -Matt -- Remove the obvious text (including the dash) to email me. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
It's not clear what you are actually looking for.
If this agent is looking to appear as your selling agent, and to receive his usual commission and then keep 50% and pass the rest to you; and that's what you indeed negotiated with him when you contacted him, only without the numbers; then, I would say, what he says makes sense, and from the ethical standpoint, you indeed have to sit down and negotiate with him. But if he is expecting something out of your pocket, not being your buyer's agent, then I wouldn't pay him a dime. He did the usual RE agent's job; what you finally chose was not from him; tough luck, but nothing unusual for a RE agent. Even the fact that you indeed worked with him, does not mean much: during that very work, you easily might get disappointed in him. If there were no obligations, then there are no obligations. If he is trying to pretend that he did what he did not, and that you are obligated to pay for it, feel free to send a letter of complaint to the entity where he gets his license -http://www.obre.state.il.us/CONSUMER/FORMS/cnrffrm.htm, plus any RE associations he is a member of, like realtor.org and http://www.nsbar.org/nsbar-elinear/public.htm. I don't think their interest in maintaining the ethics of their members goes far beyond the attempts to sell courses and brochures about the ethics to those members (though I may be wrong), but at least the agent will have to write some lies in response, and be somewhat scared - which is important to you regarding the rumors you are afraid of. regards |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:50:43 GMT, someone wrote:
I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed.... IMHO you really really muddied the waters badly by "employing" this agent in any way involving your friend's house. People do not normally "employ" brokers in that way. The house that the broker did not find, the broker should never have set foot in or been asked an opinion about, or involved in offer or appraisal of. I believe you should indeed pay something because you did bring the broker into the transaction. But what, indeed. I say $1500 as full satisfaction, send it on those conditions and see if he accepts it or has the nuts to send it back. -v. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
In article ,
Matt wrote: Hello, I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed. I am buying a property that he (my agent) did not originally show me. I am trying to decide what to pay him. Any advice or perspective is appreciated, particularly if you or someone you know has had experience dealing with a similar situation and you knew the outcome of that scenario. More details: Let's see, where to start... My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical 2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). Did you sign an agreement with the agent? What's the agreement say? I suspect you have no legal obligation to pay your real estate agent one dime if you have found a house to buy without the agent's help. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:50:43 GMT,
I wrote: I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed.... Here is an excerpt from an email that my agent sent me on Jan 27, 2004. I do this for fairness purposes and I hope that I am not violating any privacy issues: [START QUOTE] When you first contacted me, I told you that I could come out and see the unit and appraise it for $300. I aslo said that I could negotiate a contract for you at that time for $1000. Since then i have helped you learn the market values of smilar units in the area and what is needed to best position yourself for resale purposes. I have set up the MLS search for you, set up appointments, accompanied you on showings, and offered you my professional advice. Helping you through the contract and getting you a highly qualified inspector, attorney and any trades men in the future is also included. If you feel that that doen't justify 1/2 of what I typically earn for this service, I would like to know what you do feel it is worth. [END QUOTE] Note that I have declined all offers for him to help me with contract negotiations, inspector acquisition, attorney acquisition, and trades men acquisitoin. A formal appraisal also was not done for the initial property (the one I plan to buy). This stuff he has done is summarized by: [START QUOTE] I have set up the MLS search for you, set up appointments, accompanied you on showings, and offered you my professional advice. [END QUOTE] ....which is an excerpt from the above quote. -Matt -- Remove the obvious text (including the dash) to email me. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
"Matt" wrote in message ... [START QUOTE] I have set up the MLS search for you, set up appointments, accompanied you on showings, and offered you my professional advice. [END QUOTE] Since you are trying to do the fair thing (for which I commend you) one relevant fact might be how much time the agent has spent and what, if any, out of pocket expenses he has incurred. You should be able to estimate how much time he spent showing you properties which doubtless will be the bulk of his time spent. One approach to coming to a fair amount might then be to multiply his hours spent by some reasonable hourly fee, add on any out of pocket expenses, and round up to the nearest $100. Rich |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
Matt wrote:
[much snipped] [START QUOTE] I have set up the MLS search for you, set up appointments, accompanied you on showings, and offered you my professional advice. [END QUOTE] All of which is worth exactly $0 if you didn't buy any of the properties he sold you. The only service he provided that is worth something is the appraisal on the original, FSBO property. And if all he did was provide the usual "comparative analysis", that too is worth $0. Agents give that service for free as a means of attracting business. I'll repeat. I think your $1000 figure is more than fair. -- I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples, promising liberty and justice for all. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
"Matt" wrote in message ... Hello, snip You don't pay the agent anything. All commissions come from the seller. Since you did not sign an agreement for the agent to represent you, I doubt if the selling agent will give your agent anything. In any case, it's up to the sellers agent to work things out with your agent. You don't pay anything out of your pocket. Now if your agent sent you listings on a regular basis, and one of those listings was the property that you are buying, then your agent's broker is entitled to 1/2 of the commission (or whatever the seller's contract specified as the commission). Agents love to sign you up for e-mail notification of new listings, since this lets them claim that they provided you with the information on the property. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:50:43 GMT, Matt wrote:
Hello, I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed. I am buying a property that he (my agent) did not originally show me. I am trying to decide what to pay him. Any advice or perspective is appreciated, particularly if you or someone you know has had experience dealing with a similar situation and you knew the outcome of that scenario. More details: Let's see, where to start... My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical 2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). This works out to be $2937. This is significantly more then I expected to pay per our "gentlemen's agreement" I detail below. I had an amount of $1000 or less in my head. I'm sure that this agent would be very unhappy with me if I paid him $1000 or less. Unfortunately, the agent and I never discussed any numbers or percentages or set any other quantitative expectations when we made our "gentlemen's agreement." I'm realizing now that this was a key mistake on my part. All my friends and real-estate experienced people I've talked to thus far strongly feel that I should be paying this agent little if anything. A few of my friends said that they have found properties outside of what their agent had shown them and not paid their agent a dime. I am a 2nd-time buyer; I have previously purchased and sold a property in downtown Chicago; this property sold for $250k back in spring of 2002. (I sold it back then because I moved to Colorado...and now I'm back in Chicago and want to own a place again.) Even more details: I have been in the market, since early January, to buy a property for myself to live in somewhere in Chicago. A friend of mine happened to be selling his condo at the same time. He offered to sell me his place prior to listing it with his agent, at a price less then what he would list it if I didn't buy it. The place met all my requirements, and the price seemed somewhat reasonable, but I wasn't sure. I decided to employ an agent to see what else was available on the market. The agent and I orally made a "gentlemen's" agreement wherein I would pay him (the agent) standard commission (2.5% of the sale) if I bought a property that he introduced to me, and something substantially less then that if I bought the original property owned by my friend. I took my agent to visit the property being sold by my friend to have him evaluate its worth and to show him what I liked. (I also wrote a substantial document outlining my real-estate goals and preferences and requirements.) Since this agent also has an appraiser's license, I gave him the offer, if he agreed that my deal on my friend's property was good enough, to do a formal appraisal right there on the spot and start the process of my friend and I cutting a deal...and I would pay this agent the same amount I would for an appraiser's fee (even if that wouldn't be the last formal appraisal done). My agent advised me to look at other properties. After a significant search that involved approximately 10-12 property visits spread over 2 different showing days, my agent and I decided that the original property being sold by my friend was the best property available for me and my requirements. We also agreed that the $235k asking price my friend had was competitive and reasonable. I have decided to not seek any help from my agent for any further work with my purchase of my property (the original property I found myself through my friend). I am arranging all the lawyer, inspector, etc work to close the sale myself. I am not comfortable paying the $2900 my agent seeks. Furthermore, it may be difficult or impossible for me to drive this expense into my mortgage loan, because my seller is not that interested in doing it. This makes for a considerable out-of-pocket expense for me. All in all, I'm fairly unhappy. On the flip side, I am quite sensitive to honoring my agreement with this agent. He seems good, and I was considering having a long-term relationship with this gentlemen. I have to admit that I'm not yet certain that I am as interested in a long-term bond with agent after these discussions have been as uncomfortable for me as they have been thus far. Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much for any help, -Matt Unless it's in writing, I don't think you have to pay him anything tho you both agree he should be paid. In my mind, his suggestion of half his normal commission (regardless what the dollar amount turns out to be) is reasonable. But since I don't think he can prove his case with evidence in a court of law, I think your wishes will prevail. Also, I somehow I think you are being too diplomatic. My gut instinct is that this fellow isn't going to want to sit down with you to re-negotiate his fee. He already tried to explain his fee in writing. He may feel that sitting down with you is wasting more of his time??? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical
2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). This works out to be $2937. This is significantly more then I expected to pay per our "gentlemen's agreement" I detail below. I had an amount of $1000 or less in my head. I'm sure that this agent would be very unhappy with me if I paid him $1000 or less. Unfortunately, the agent and I never discussed any numbers or percentages or set any other quantitative expectations when we made our "gentlemen's agreement." I'm realizing now that this was a key mistake on my part. Yes indeed. My understanding is that in general, contracts related to real estate must be in writing or they have no force. However, you'd have to check with a lawyer to know for sure. I decided to employ an agent to see what else was available on the market. The agent and I orally made a "gentlemen's" agreement wherein I would pay him (the agent) standard commission (2.5% of the sale) if I bought a property that he introduced to me, and something substantially less then that if I bought the original property owned by my friend But you didn't agree on an amount, and don't have anything in writing to back up your claim. Right? I took my agent to visit the property being sold by my friend to have him evaluate its worth and to show him what I liked. (I also wrote a substantial document outlining my real-estate goals and preferences and requirements.) Since this agent also has an appraiser's license, I gave him the offer, if he agreed that my deal on my friend's property was good enough, to do a formal appraisal right there on the spot and start the process of my friend and I cutting a deal...and I would pay this agent the same amount I would for an appraiser's fee (even if that wouldn't be the last formal appraisal done). What would be the normal appraiser's fee? My agent advised me to look at other properties. After a significant search that involved approximately 10-12 property visits spread over 2 different showing days, my agent and I decided that the original property being sold by my friend was the best property available for me and my requirements. We also agreed that the $235k asking price my friend had was competitive and reasonable. I have decided to not seek any help from my agent for any further work with my purchase of my property (the original property I found myself through my friend). I am arranging all the lawyer, inspector, etc work to close the sale myself. I am not comfortable paying the $2900 my agent seeks. Furthermore, it may be difficult or impossible for me to drive this expense into my mortgage loan, because my seller is not that interested in doing it. This makes for a considerable out-of-pocket expense for me. All in all, I'm fairly unhappy. Putting that expense into the mortgage loan would have exactly the same effect as reducing your down payment by a corresponding amount. On the flip side, I am quite sensitive to honoring my agreement with this agent. He seems good, and I was considering having a long-term relationship with this gentlemen. I have to admit that I'm not yet certain that I am as interested in a long-term bond with agent after these discussions have been as uncomfortable for me as they have been thus far. But apparently you and he do not agree on what the agreement is, even if we ignore the lack of a written agreement. Here's my take on the situation: 1) You have no written agreement, so you don't owe the agent anything. That is, if you decide to give him nothing, he has no legal recourse. 2) On the other hand, you want to do the right thing, whatever that might be. 3) On the other other hand, you and the agent don't agree on what the right thing is. Moreover, you haven't told us what you think the right thing is, or why; you've just told us that the agent thinks the right thing is to ignore the part of the agreement that says that you will pay substantially less if you buy your friend's property? So what do you think is right, and why? In particular, does the agent agree with you that your deal was for you to pay substantially less if you bought your friend's property? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
Matt wrote in message . ..
I decided to employ an agent to see what else was available on the market. The agent and I orally made a "gentlemen's" agreement wherein I would pay him (the agent) standard commission (2.5% of the sale) if I bought a property that he introduced to me, and something substantially less then that if I bought the original property owned by my friend. I took my agent to visit the property being sold by my friend to have him evaluate its worth and to show him what I liked. (I also wrote a substantial document outlining my real-estate goals and preferences and requirements.) Since this agent also has an appraiser's license, I gave him the offer, if he agreed that my deal on my friend's property was good enough, to do a formal appraisal right there on the spot and start the process of my friend and I cutting a deal...and I would pay this agent the same amount I would for an appraiser's fee (even if that wouldn't be the last formal appraisal done). My agent advised me to look at other properties. After a significant search that involved approximately 10-12 property visits spread over 2 different showing days, my agent and I decided that the original property being sold by my friend was the best property available for me and my requirements. We also agreed that the $235k asking price my friend had was competitive and reasonable. I have decided to not seek any help from my agent for any further work with my purchase of my property (the original property I found myself through my friend). I am arranging all the lawyer, inspector, etc work to close the sale myself. I am not comfortable paying the $2900 my agent seeks. Furthermore, it may be difficult or impossible for me to drive this expense into my mortgage loan, because my seller is not that interested in doing it. This makes for a considerable out-of-pocket expense for me. All in all, I'm fairly unhappy. On the flip side, I am quite sensitive to honoring my agreement with this agent. He seems good, and I was considering having a long-term relationship with this gentlemen. I have to admit that I'm not yet certain that I am as interested in a long-term bond with agent after these discussions have been as uncomfortable for me as they have been thus far. Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much for any help, -Matt I can't comment on what the law would say, but I feel bad for your RE agent. Who's to say you would have purchased your friends' house if the agent had not taken you around to see several competitive houses? Sounds to me like you were uncertain enough that, without the agent's involvement -- on whatever level -- you may never have purchased it. Sounds to me like you needed time and a professional's opinion to help you reach that decision, no? Even if all that you needed was a *sounding board* to listen to you work out the decision in your own mind. If nothing else, bringing in the agent showed your friend you were seriously contemplating the purchase, and gave him reason to hold off listing it through a broker. If he had done this, then you would've been out of luck or had to meet a higher listing price. Right? Since it's an FSBO, the agent essentially benefited both you *and* your friend, IMHO, and frankly I think he deserves at least 2.5%. Of course without a written agreement, he has no legal grounds. If it were me, I'd go to the seller and suggest that you split the 2.5% and pay him together. Then to get my full money's worth, I'd go ahead and use the agent to finish the deal... one agent to represent both seller and buyer. jen |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
Matt wrote:
[snip] My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical 2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). This works out to be $2937. This is significantly more then I expected to pay per our "gentlemen's agreement" I detail below. I had an amount of $1000 or less in my head. I'm sure that this agent would be very unhappy with me if I paid him $1000 or less. [snip] I decided to employ an agent to see what else was available on the market. The agent and I orally made a "gentlemen's" agreement wherein I would pay him (the agent) standard commission (2.5% of the sale) if I bought a property that he introduced to me, and something substantially less then that if I bought the original property owned by my friend. [snip] My agent advised me to look at other properties. After a significant search that involved approximately 10-12 property visits spread over 2 different showing days, my agent and I decided that the original property being sold by my friend was the best property available for me and my requirements. We also agreed that the $235k asking price my friend had was competitive and reasonable. I have decided to not seek any help from my agent for any further work with my purchase of my property (the original property I found myself through my friend). I am arranging all the lawyer, inspector, etc work to close the sale myself. [snip] The problem is that "substantially less" is indefinite. I would guess you have an "agreement to agree in the future", which legally isn't a contract at all. I think the agent is tryhing to take advantage of you, but the agent did provide some services for which you should morally pay. Let's get down to basics. If you had bought one of the other properties the agent showed you, he would have gotten half of the commission, probably 3%. He would have also helped you with all the paperwork, making the written offer to buy, letters of instruction to the escrow company, etc. But you didn't buy any of the properties he showed you, and you didn't make use of those "closing" services. Technically you bought a FSBO (for sale by owner), and there was no commission to split. Now that's just the luck of the draw. When an agent shows a buyer araound, there is no guarantee that the buyer will buy one of the properties the agent shows. In fact, the buyer may decide not to buy anything at all. In that case, the agent gets nothing for his time and trouble. But that's a risk that all real estate agents take every time they show a property. It's just part of the real estate business, and unless you have an agreement to the property you would owe him nothing. But you do have an agreement to pay him "something", "substantially less" than his half of the commission. If he wanted half of his usual commission, he should have said so at the outset when you made your "gentleman's agreement". As it is, he can either take whatever you offer, or try to get a court to award him a higher payment. And he did provide you with a valuable service (other than showing you properties you didn't buy). He did a full appraisal on the property you ended up buying. A real appraisal is more work than just the typical real estate agent's "list of comparable sales", and there is some potential liability if he gets it wrong. As I understand it, the usual going rate for an appraisal these days is around $400-$500. At least, that's what lenders are asking for(*). So I think your $1000 offer is generous. If it were me I would probably offer him $1000 and see if he takes it(+). If he threatens to go to court over it, you'll have to decide how much the risk (of losing in court) is worth to you vs. the $1937 difference between what he's asking and what you think his services are worth. Then you can decide whether to sweeten your offer or not. If he's completely adamant, you could go see a real-estate lawyer for further advice, but that will probably cost you $200-$300 so it's better if you can settle without getting lawyers involved. (*) This is often inflated. Many lenders will do a "computer appraisal" costing around $50 and then charge the borrower for a full in-person appraisal. But that's not relevant to this case where OP did, in fact, receive a full appraisal. (+) And point out that the usual fee for an appraisal is $500 or less, and the other services he provided are part of the normal risks of doing business as a real-estate agent. -- I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples, promising liberty and justice for all. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
Hello,
I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed. I am buying a property that he (my agent) did not originally show me. I am trying to decide what to pay him. Any advice or perspective is appreciated, particularly if you or someone you know has had experience dealing with a similar situation and you knew the outcome of that scenario. There are some articles that might help at: http://www.real-estate-supply.com/re...e-articles.htm Jo Ellen |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
You hired a Buyers agent.
He was representing you and not the seller. If the agent did any work to help with the sale, he is entitled to the commision you agreed to. If he did no work than he is not entitled to a commission. PJ |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
So your realtor did show you 10-12 properties? That's quite a few and I
would think he deserves to be compensated. He is already cutting you a deal by offering you half the usual rate (which I might add is 1/2 point less then then usual rate in nevada). I don't know how Illinois works but in Nevada the realtor typically splits the comissions 50/50 with a broker they work under, making their profit considerably less. On top of that, there are plenty of fees and costs involved with being a realtor such as MLS membership. If you decided you wanted to buy a home on your own then you should have done that before working with this person. Even if you didn't use all of his services they were available and provided a good safety net if you did need it. Do you think you should get a refund of your auto insurance premiums if you never use them? The fact that he is already trying to give you a break and you're still contesting it I find a little rediculous. -Jeff "Matt" wrote in message ... Hello, I am trying to settle a relationship with a real-estate agent I have employed. I am buying a property that he (my agent) did not originally show me. I am trying to decide what to pay him. Any advice or perspective is appreciated, particularly if you or someone you know has had experience dealing with a similar situation and you knew the outcome of that scenario. More details: Let's see, where to start... My real-estate agent wants 1.25% of commission (half of his typical 2.5%) on a $235,000 property in Chicago, IL, USA that I plan to buy that he did not find for me (I found it on my own). This works out to be $2937. This is significantly more then I expected to pay per our "gentlemen's agreement" I detail below. I had an amount of $1000 or less in my head. I'm sure that this agent would be very unhappy with me if I paid him $1000 or less. Unfortunately, the agent and I never discussed any numbers or percentages or set any other quantitative expectations when we made our "gentlemen's agreement." I'm realizing now that this was a key mistake on my part. All my friends and real-estate experienced people I've talked to thus far strongly feel that I should be paying this agent little if anything. A few of my friends said that they have found properties outside of what their agent had shown them and not paid their agent a dime. I am a 2nd-time buyer; I have previously purchased and sold a property in downtown Chicago; this property sold for $250k back in spring of 2002. (I sold it back then because I moved to Colorado...and now I'm back in Chicago and want to own a place again.) Even more details: I have been in the market, since early January, to buy a property for myself to live in somewhere in Chicago. A friend of mine happened to be selling his condo at the same time. He offered to sell me his place prior to listing it with his agent, at a price less then what he would list it if I didn't buy it. The place met all my requirements, and the price seemed somewhat reasonable, but I wasn't sure. I decided to employ an agent to see what else was available on the market. The agent and I orally made a "gentlemen's" agreement wherein I would pay him (the agent) standard commission (2.5% of the sale) if I bought a property that he introduced to me, and something substantially less then that if I bought the original property owned by my friend. I took my agent to visit the property being sold by my friend to have him evaluate its worth and to show him what I liked. (I also wrote a substantial document outlining my real-estate goals and preferences and requirements.) Since this agent also has an appraiser's license, I gave him the offer, if he agreed that my deal on my friend's property was good enough, to do a formal appraisal right there on the spot and start the process of my friend and I cutting a deal...and I would pay this agent the same amount I would for an appraiser's fee (even if that wouldn't be the last formal appraisal done). My agent advised me to look at other properties. After a significant search that involved approximately 10-12 property visits spread over 2 different showing days, my agent and I decided that the original property being sold by my friend was the best property available for me and my requirements. We also agreed that the $235k asking price my friend had was competitive and reasonable. I have decided to not seek any help from my agent for any further work with my purchase of my property (the original property I found myself through my friend). I am arranging all the lawyer, inspector, etc work to close the sale myself. I am not comfortable paying the $2900 my agent seeks. Furthermore, it may be difficult or impossible for me to drive this expense into my mortgage loan, because my seller is not that interested in doing it. This makes for a considerable out-of-pocket expense for me. All in all, I'm fairly unhappy. On the flip side, I am quite sensitive to honoring my agreement with this agent. He seems good, and I was considering having a long-term relationship with this gentlemen. I have to admit that I'm not yet certain that I am as interested in a long-term bond with agent after these discussions have been as uncomfortable for me as they have been thus far. Any advice or perspective would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much for any help, -Matt -- Remove the obvious text (including the dash) to email me. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking help on terms with real estate agent
"Jeff Smith" wrote
So your realtor did show you 10-12 properties? That's quite a few and I would think he deserves to be compensated. He is already cutting you a deal Oh Please!!!!!!!!! The agent failed to find the buyer an acceptable property. You agents swear that the seller pays all commisions, you can't have it both ways! Give the agent $300 as an act of pure charity and if he isn't happy as punch take the $300 check and rip it up, the agent is entitled to nothing, zilch, sero. Paying welfare checks to agent only keeps them hanging around stinking up the neighborhood ... everyone in the free world hates brokers, please just make them ago away! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT- Real stars and real heroes | Metalworking | |||
OT-: Real Estate Crash coming soon ?? | Metalworking | |||
heat pump | Home Repair |