Lots of choices out their but are they the right one? Making sure you
choose the right one can save you the time and effort , and money it takes
to upgrade later. Much like any technology
http://www.tardis-db.co.uk/navigation.html digital cameras are rapidly
changing
and vary from point and shoot to more professional Digital SLRS. In order
to better educate the consumer on whats right for him or her some good
advice would be to research http://www.pearlcompany.ca/navigation.html
digital
camera reviews from respected sources. With allot of choices to be made in
regards to the quality of the digital sensor, (CCD) or (CMOS) some amateur
photographers might be happy with a 4 mega-pixel sensor.

OtherPhotographers well versed in landscape as well as portraits might
choose a
more powerful sensor as hight as 22 mega pixels powered by CMOS technology.
Many online website sell the product but don't offer any research into how
to use the digital camera or the finer points of the camera. Chose your
online website carefully some might not want to go throught the
http://www.bargainfindsonebay.com/navigation.html eBay auction experience of
buying a
digital camera online where you never know what your going to get.

Take the time to get to know what the digital camera is like to use, some
retail stores will even let you " Test Drive " some of the newest digital
cameras before purchase. A good rule of thumb is to stick with a retailer
that both has a physical location and online presence so if you run into
problems with the digital device you can bring it back to the retailer for a
refund or exchange or warranty. If you choose to buy a camera from someone
you don't know their is risk that you might be stuck with it regardless of
the way it arrives if it doesn't exceed or meet your expectation.
http://www.yourseoconsulting.com/navigation.html Digital Camera Advice
websites are in no
short supply so make sure to read up on your pending purchase, thats all I
have to say and good luck selecting your next digital camera.

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:22:38 -0700, "Digital Camera Reviewer"
wrote:

Lots of choices out their but are they the right one? Making sure you
choose the right one can save you the time and effort , and money it takes
to upgrade later. Much like any technology
http://www.spamming_sack_of_****.uk/navigation.html digital cameras are rapidly
changing
and vary from point and shoot to more professional Digital SLRS. In order
to better educate the consumer on whats right for him or her some good
advice would be to research http://spamming_sack_of_****/navigation.html
digital
camera reviews from respected sources. With allot of choices to be made in
regards to the quality of the digital sensor, (CCD) or (CMOS) some amateur
photographers might be happy with a 4 mega-pixel sensor.

OtherPhotographers well versed in landscape as well as portraits might
choose a
more powerful sensor as hight as 22 mega pixels powered by CMOS technology.
Many online website sell the product but don't offer any research into how
to use the digital camera or the finer points of the camera. Chose your
online website carefully some might not want to go throught the
http://spamming_sack_of_****/navigation.html eBay auction experience of
buying a
digital camera online where you never know what your going to get.

Take the time to get to know what the digital camera is like to use, some
retail stores will even let you " Test Drive " some of the newest digital
cameras before purchase. A good rule of thumb is to stick with a retailer
that both has a physical location and online presence so if you run into
problems with the digital device you can bring it back to the retailer for a
refund or exchange or warranty. If you choose to buy a camera from someone
you don't know their is risk that you might be stuck with it regardless of
the way it arrives if it doesn't exceed or meet your expectation.
http://spamming_sack_of_****/navigation.html Digital Camera Advice
websites are in no
short supply so make sure to read up on your pending purchase, thats all I
have to say and good luck selecting your next digital camera.



Do you think by registering four domain names that people will think
your SPAM is legitimate? You need to be a whole lot smarter than that
to be successful, so **** off spammer.

PeterD wrote:
....



Do you think by registering four domain names that people will think
your SPAM is legitimate? You need to be a whole lot smarter than that
to be successful, so **** off spammer.

Peter,

do you think full quoting the SPAM makes sense?

--
Uwe Bonnes

Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:35:02 +0000 (UTC), Uwe Bonnes
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
...



Do you think by registering four domain names that people will think
your SPAM is legitimate? You need to be a whole lot smarter than that
to be successful, so **** off spammer.

Peter,

do you think full quoting the SPAM makes sense?

---
Sure; why not?

Bandwidth is cheap and by posting the original SPAMming sonofabitch's
text, the anger in the reply to it isn't diminished.

JF

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:35:02 +0000 (UTC), Uwe Bonnes
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
...



Do you think by registering four domain names that people will think
your SPAM is legitimate? You need to be a whole lot smarter than that
to be successful, so **** off spammer.

Peter,

do you think full quoting the SPAM makes sense?

Did you notice the fact that all the URLs were munged?

PeterD wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:35:02 +0000 (UTC), Uwe Bonnes
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
...

Do you think by registering four domain names that people will think
your SPAM is legitimate? You need to be a whole lot smarter than that
to be successful, so **** off spammer.
Peter,

do you think full quoting the SPAM makes sense?

Did you notice the fact that all the URLs were munged?

Did you notice three of the four URL´s were illegitimate??

Daniel

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:55:38 +1000, "
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:35:02 +0000 (UTC), Uwe Bonnes
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
...

Do you think by registering four domain names that people will think
your SPAM is legitimate? You need to be a whole lot smarter than that
to be successful, so **** off spammer.
Peter,

do you think full quoting the SPAM makes sense?

Did you notice the fact that all the URLs were munged?

Did you notice three of the four URL´s were illegitimate??

Daniel

Just because a URL doesn't have a known father, is no reason not to
accept it.