Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "geoff" wrote in message news ![]() In message , half_pint writes "Bob Brenchley." wrote in message .. . On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 01:29:24 -0000, "half_pint" wrote: I dont watch DVD period. Why should I suffer for you to indulge your fetish? ****tard, i hardly think watching a film in the current best sound and audio format a fetish. A 22:9 crt is definitely out of the question, the 16:9 is the best compromise between those wanting to watch films as they were intended They were *intended* to be watched in a high capacity *cinema*, hence the wide format, so everyone could sit near the screen. Rubbish - the shape of the cinema screen has nothing to do with the seating. Of course you are wrong, you can build two widescreen cinemas in the space used by one equivilant 4:3 picture. Thats the *only* resason we ended up with this WS garbage. Nothing to do with that oh so pretensious phrase "as the director intended" so go stick you fingers in your ears and chant "I love my widescreen". You have been brainwashed into buying widescreen, although how this was achieved is perplexing since it implies you had a brain to wash. I thought that 16:9 formed a golden rectangle. Anyway, rant on if you wish, but that's the standard which is on it's way in, so what are you going to do when your trusty old 4:3 finally croaks - stop watching TV? Why all the argument? The reason behind widescreen is irrelevant, the fact is that it's the format of the future, virtually every movie in existance was filmed in something closer to 16:9 than 4:3. Regardless of the reason, this means that the director intended it to be viewed in a widescreen format so with a 4:3 screen you miss things on the edges of the screen. If theaters were all 4:3 then the shots would be made so as to not place things off the edges. That said, I don't own a widescreen set, but I do have one large enough that WS movies are of acceptable size. Many DVD's have both formats on one disc so there's no compromise, and to me DVD is an amazing format, it's the first to really catch on since VHS and side by side there's no comparison. The picture and sound quality from DVD is amazing, the whole movie fits on one side of one disc, there's random access, no rewinding, and the discs themselves are compact and cheap, they don't wear out, it's the only format I buy anymore. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Replacement picture tube out of warranty? | UK diy | |||
Tech Review: Victor's (8liners/Genao) Replacement Arcade RGB Monitor Chassis (LONG) | Electronics Repair | |||
Cordless drills | Woodworking |