Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.autos.tech,alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,636
Default The cellphone paradox - where are all the accidents?

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 01:10:23 -0500, ceg wrote:

The cellphone paradox - where are all the accidents?

The Fermi Paradox is essentially a situation where we "assume" something
that "seems obvious"; but, if that assumption is true, then something
else
"should" be happening. But it's not.

Hence, the paradox.

Same thing with the cellphone (distracted-driving) paradox.

Where are all the accidents?

They don't seem to exist.
At least not in the United States.
Not by the federal government's own accident figures.

Some snipped.

So how is cell phone ownership determined? How many are laying in
drawers or
in landfills? Heck, I have three working models. I've probably thrown
away three
or four. No one can rightfully accuse me of being tech savvy. I buy
used ones and use
them until they quit working.
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.autos.tech,alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 205
Default The cellphone paradox - where are all the accidents?

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 07:50:56 -0500, Dean Hoffman wrote:

So how is cell phone ownership determined? How many are laying in
drawers or in landfills? Heck, I have three working models. I've
probably thrown away three or four. No one can rightfully accuse me of
being tech savvy. I buy used ones and use them until they quit working.


That's a different question, but it's quite apropos.
It's actually not "ownership" that matters so much as "use" while driving.
But, we all know that it's terribly difficult to get *reliable*
statistics of cellphone use while driving.

a. How do we know the cellphone found in an accident was used while the
accident occurred?
b. How do we know it was the driver using it?

That's why the statistics on distracted-driving-caused accidents are
useless (or almost useless) to help us resolve the paradox.

We all feel that cellphone use while driving *should* be a contributor to
the accidents, but the accidents aren't there. That's the paradox.

We can only assume one of two things, neither of which are we willing to
assume:
1. Nobody is using their cellphones while driving, or,
2. Cellphone use while driving isn't causing accidents at any appreciable
level.

No other options are available to us, given the reliable data on total
accidents, year over year over year.

Hence the paradox.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Very OT - probability paradox Bob Engelhardt Metalworking 7 November 6th 11 01:01 PM
The Turning Green Paradox charlieb Woodturning 8 June 18th 07 10:30 PM
The Time / Money / Age Paradox charlieb Woodworking 3 May 20th 07 04:49 PM
Twin Paradox Resolution JohnM Metalworking 1 August 13th 05 04:42 AM
Woodworking paradox Never Enough Money Woodworking 3 June 11th 05 08:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"