On 1 Mar 2007 23:53:14 -0800, "David L. Jones"
Gave us:

Yep, didn't you know that scope you are using is only a few % accurate
on the vertical scale?


You guys must be behind the times.

On Mar 2, 7:31 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 23:53:14 -0800, "David L. Jones"
Gave us:

Yep, didn't you know that scope you are using is only a few % accurate
on the vertical scale?

You guys must be behind the times.

My 6000 series Agilent is not behind the times, and it's only +/-2%
accurate on the vertical scale.
A good analog scope like say the Tek2465 is only 2% as well.

Perhaps those two are the exception huh? Care to post some links to
prove otherwise?
I could post until the cows come home scopes that are no better than a
few % accurate on the vertical scale.

Dave

"David L. Jones" wrote in
ups.com:

On Mar 2, 7:31 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 23:53:14 -0800, "David L. Jones"
Gave us:

Yep, didn't you know that scope you are using is only a few % accurate
on the vertical scale?

You guys must be behind the times.

My 6000 series Agilent is not behind the times, and it's only +/-2%
accurate on the vertical scale.
A good analog scope like say the Tek2465 is only 2% as well.

Better look again;IIRC,it's 1.25% . That does not include the cursors.

It's not really significant,as you can't get that resolution on the screen.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net