Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
I know I'm getting up there in years, but is the writing on semiconductors
getting fainter and fainter? I have to drag everything under the microscope just to read the markings. Even on DIPs for christ's sake. WTF - are the chip makers actually saving money by doing this? |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
|
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
JW wrote: I know I'm getting up there in years, but is the writing on semiconductors getting fainter and fainter? I have to drag everything under the microscope just to read the markings. Even on DIPs for christ's sake. You're correct. WTF - are the chip makers actually saving money by doing this? Many of them are actually now laser etched rather than printed to help avoid counterfeiting. It's much less visible. Graham |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
JW wrote:
I know I'm getting up there in years, but is the writing on semiconductors getting fainter and fainter? I have to drag everything under the microscope just to read the markings. Even on DIPs for christ's sake. WTF - are the chip makers actually saving money by doing this? I was told that the marking technique they now use is better for automated placement equipment that has automated optical scans. I agree it still sucks - can only read the numbers when you have them at *just* the right angle, with just the right amount of light, just the right amount of magnification. Cheers PeteS |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... JW wrote: I know I'm getting up there in years, but is the writing on semiconductors getting fainter and fainter? I have to drag everything under the microscope just to read the markings. Even on DIPs for christ's sake. You're correct. WTF - are the chip makers actually saving money by doing this? Many of them are actually now laser etched rather than printed to help avoid counterfeiting. It's much less visible. Specifically, to prevent people from wiping it off and writing higher specifications (e.g., industrial vs. commercial temperature, or higher clock speed), right? |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
mc wrote: "Eeyore" wrote in message ... JW wrote: I know I'm getting up there in years, but is the writing on semiconductors getting fainter and fainter? I have to drag everything under the microscope just to read the markings. Even on DIPs for christ's sake. You're correct. WTF - are the chip makers actually saving money by doing this? Many of them are actually now laser etched rather than printed to help avoid counterfeiting. It's much less visible. Specifically, to prevent people from wiping it off and writing higher specifications (e.g., industrial vs. commercial temperature, or higher clock speed), right? Or just offering counterfeits generally. It's pretty difficult to counterfeit laser etched marking. Counterfeit semis are a big issue. http://sound.westhost.com/counterfeit.htm http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&h...uctors&spell=1 Graham |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
"PeteS" wrote in message oups.com... JW wrote: I know I'm getting up there in years, but is the writing on semiconductors getting fainter and fainter? I have to drag everything under the microscope just to read the markings. Even on DIPs for christ's sake. WTF - are the chip makers actually saving money by doing this? I was told that the marking technique they now use is better for automated placement equipment that has automated optical scans. I agree it still sucks - can only read the numbers when you have them at *just* the right angle, with just the right amount of light, just the right amount of magnification. Cheers PeteS yeah the angle has to be just right, and if its been knocking about in a parts bin for a while or had a greasy finger on it, ... it seems like theyr using black lettering sometimes Colin =^.^= |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
"colin" wrote in message
... yeah the angle has to be just right, and if its been knocking about in a parts bin for a while or had a greasy finger on it, ... it seems like theyr using black lettering sometimes Sometimes, a light smear of white heatsink goop makes the letters show up better. A little. Slightly. Sometimes. Tim -- Deep Fryer: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Is it me or...
"Tim Williams" wrote in
: "colin" wrote in message ... yeah the angle has to be just right, and if its been knocking about in a parts bin for a while or had a greasy finger on it, ... it seems like theyr using black lettering sometimes Sometimes, a light smear of white heatsink goop makes the letters show up better. A little. Slightly. Sometimes. Tim Nice trick. Another is angled light, shortwave, so a bright blue LED. Cowl it so you can't see any direct light off it. The colour isn't that important, but brightness is. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|