Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hello all
I am trying to avoid spending 140 dollars on a monocular 35x zoom from bargain microscopes.com, it has an optional focus lense upgrade to make 56x i need this for surface mount device rework (repair and resoldering) i suppose 30x is enough for surface mount so what i am asking is there any way to achieve 20x to 30x magnification using compound magnifiers. So far i have found that sticking a 2.5x to a 2x (compound) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length is enough for larger SOIC's. so i am thinking a good 5x desktop magnifier lamp (about 30 dollars) and a decent 3x magnifier (about 10 dollars) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length should provide enough to at least do soic's. I say this cause my 2.5x/2x compound is almost good enough for bigger soic's so the 3x/5x compound might be enough to handle quad flat packs (those 100+ pin IC's you see on PC motherboards etc. ). at any rate, that is my real question. Does anyone here have experience or KNOWLEDGE about cheap improvised magnification using compounded magnifiers with adequate focal length (working distance from lense) for taking out Flat packs and soic's, in other words, the very small surface mount stuff? In fact, any sort of magnification including diy microscopes would be okay. Thanks for your help (i am trying to avoid having to read a very large microscope FAQ cause i am still too busing reading all the stuff i found google.com searching "electronics tutorials" and Horowitz's "Art of electronics") ; ) |
#2
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... hello all I am trying to avoid spending 140 dollars on a monocular 35x zoom from bargain microscopes.com, it has an optional focus lense upgrade to make 56x i need this for surface mount device rework (repair and resoldering) i suppose 30x is enough for surface mount so what i am asking is there any way to achieve 20x to 30x magnification using compound magnifiers. So far i have found that sticking a 2.5x to a 2x (compound) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length is enough for larger SOIC's. so i am thinking a good 5x desktop magnifier lamp (about 30 dollars) and a decent 3x magnifier (about 10 dollars) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length should provide enough to at least do soic's. I say this cause my 2.5x/2x compound is almost good enough for bigger soic's so the 3x/5x compound might be enough to handle quad flat packs (those 100+ pin IC's you see on PC motherboards etc. ). at any rate, that is my real question. Does anyone here have experience or KNOWLEDGE about cheap improvised magnification using compounded magnifiers with adequate focal length (working distance from lense) for taking out Flat packs and soic's, in other words, the very small surface mount stuff? In fact, any sort of magnification including diy microscopes would be okay. Thanks for your help (i am trying to avoid having to read a very large microscope FAQ cause i am still too busing reading all the stuff i found google.com searching "electronics tutorials" and Horowitz's "Art of electronics") ; ) A kid's plastic microscope from a toy shop is perfectly adequate for such a task. Its only if you need to take measurements, then accurate graticules become important. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#3
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
30X?! You have got to be kidding! I have a 9X watchmakers glass
which I consider to be a bit too strong. |
#4
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This invitation to Treadmill Technicians to join this new group
http://groups.google.ca/group/Treadm...air-Technology we need to break the shell on this knowledge, it is useful for the public, still they keep it classified to make more money. if U want to teach us somthing about treadmills, or need help, join us,... |
#5
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if U want to teach us somthing about treadmills, or need help, join
LOL.. Spam about reparing treadmills?? How complicated could they be? Electric motor, belt, bearings and maybe a fan... - Mike |
#6
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Goldenshuttle" wrote in message oups.com... This invitation to Treadmill Technicians to join this new group http://groups.google.ca/group/Treadm...air-Technology we need to break the shell on this knowledge, it is useful for the public, still they keep it classified to make more money. if U want to teach us somthing about treadmills, or need help, join us,... Rather than learning about treadmills, you should learn about Usenet. What has this got to do with this thread? Dave |
#8
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Jones wrote: so i am thinking a good 5x desktop magnifier lamp (about 30 dollars) and a decent 3x magnifier (about 10 dollars) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length should provide enough to at least do soic's. I say this cause my 2.5x/2x compound is almost good enough for bigger soic's so the 3x/5x compound might be enough to handle quad flat packs (those 100+ pin IC's you see on PC motherboards etc. ). surface mount stuff? In fact, any sort of magnification including diy microscopes would be okay. Try this: http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/uzoom/uzoom.htm I have not built one but holding up a camara lens to a pair of binoculars gave me a promising image. Chris thanks very much for the link. Exactly what i was looking for. When you held up the camera lens to the binoculars, was the image reversed by any chance? The design in the link calls for twin prisms. Just wondering if excluding the prisms might cause a flipping of the image. Thanks again |
#9
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Chris Jones wrote: so i am thinking a good 5x desktop magnifier lamp (about 30 dollars) and a decent 3x magnifier (about 10 dollars) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length should provide enough to at least do soic's. I say this cause my 2.5x/2x compound is almost good enough for bigger soic's so the 3x/5x compound might be enough to handle quad flat packs (those 100+ pin IC's you see on PC motherboards etc. ). surface mount stuff? In fact, any sort of magnification including diy microscopes would be okay. Try this: http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/uzoom/uzoom.htm I have not built one but holding up a camara lens to a pair of binoculars gave me a promising image. Chris thanks very much for the link. Exactly what i was looking for. When you held up the camera lens to the binoculars, was the image reversed by any chance? The design in the link calls for twin prisms. Just wondering if excluding the prisms might cause a flipping of the image. Thanks again Can't remember and I don't have time to try it again tonight, sorry. If you have any success please post your results. I have bought a microscope now but I'm still curious about what can be achieved for little money. I bought some quite reasonable Meade 10x50 binoculars for £10 (about $15) recently from a supermarket called Lidl in the UK. I was thinking of making a microscope one day. Chris |
#10
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Jones wrote:
wrote: Chris Jones wrote: so i am thinking a good 5x desktop magnifier lamp (about 30 dollars) and a decent 3x magnifier (about 10 dollars) both with about 6 to 8 inch focal length should provide enough to at least do soic's. I say this cause my 2.5x/2x compound is almost good enough for bigger soic's so the 3x/5x compound might be enough to handle quad flat packs (those 100+ pin IC's you see on PC motherboards etc. ). surface mount stuff? In fact, any sort of magnification including diy microscopes would be okay. Try this: http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/uzoom/uzoom.htm I have not built one but holding up a camara lens to a pair of binoculars gave me a promising image. Chris thanks very much for the link. Exactly what i was looking for. When you held up the camera lens to the binoculars, was the image reversed by any chance? The design in the link calls for twin prisms. Just wondering if excluding the prisms might cause a flipping of the image. Thanks again Can't remember and I don't have time to try it again tonight, sorry. If you have any success please post your results. I have bought a microscope now but I'm still curious about what can be achieved for little money. I bought some quite reasonable Meade 10x50 binoculars for £10 (about $15) recently from a supermarket called Lidl in the UK. I was thinking of making a microscope one day. Chris I tried it again, a standard SLR lens (58mm focal length) with the "film" end of the lens towards the object and the other end pressed up against one lens of the binoculars. The image was the right way up, and the magnification was very impressive. You just need some powerful illumination and you'll be soldering 0201 resistors in no time. Chris |
#11
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello, !
You wrote on 19 Mar 2006 02:11:52 -0800: w hello all w Thanks for your help (i am trying to avoid having to read a very w large w microscope FAQ cause i am still too busing reading all the stuff i w found google.com searching "electronics tutorials" and Horowitz's w "Art w of electronics") w ; ) Like your previous poster, I find a jewellers eyeglass (Loupe) quite adequate with the advantage that with a little practice it leaves both hands free. I mostly use a 3X which gives a decent overall view but I use a twin lens 15X to zoom right in, for a close look. These items are really cheap and very useful in a great many unrelated fields. If you are even meaner than that however, I also have a salvaged lens from an old discarded slide projector which cost nothing and is very effective but has to be handheld. With best regards, 3T39. E-mail: |
#12
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3T39 wrote:
Hello, ! You wrote on 19 Mar 2006 02:11:52 -0800: w hello all w Thanks for your help (i am trying to avoid having to read a very w large w microscope FAQ cause i am still too busing reading all the stuff i w found google.com searching "electronics tutorials" and Horowitz's w "Art w of electronics") w ; ) I do a lot of watch repair. The watch & clockmaker's supply company S. Larose http://www.slarose.com/ has a very good selection of loupes of various types (hand held, eyeglass mount, headband type). Go to the site & search "loupe". Since I wear glasses, I find the eyeglass mount type especially convenient, they can produce 2 strengths & flip out of the way easily if you're alternating tasks. Dan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Case against cheap machinery | Woodworking | |||
Cheap laser line for tiling ? | UK diy | |||
Cheap Air Tools Setup? | Woodworking | |||
Cheap drills | UK diy | |||
Cheap Compressors | UK diy |