Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:25:09 +0000, Pooh Bear
wrote: Bret Ludwig wrote: wrote: snip Further, NO one here ever made such a claim, save you. The statement was VERY simpe: ANY solid state amplifier with substantially more power than 20 watts is going to sound MUCH better than ANY 20 watt tube amplifier when both are being asked to deliver more than 20 watts. That means a 50 watt SS amplifier will do better at 35 watts than a 20 watt tube amplifier trying to do 35 watts,. I wholly agree. However what happens when both are asked to deliver 2000 watts? But only for a very miniscule time, and average putting out, say, 500 mW? A 36dB transient ? You are joking yes ? No, he's simply thrashing about in defence of a lost argument - as usual. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Brown's gas?? | Metalworking | |||
OT - Katrina and Insurance Claims | Metalworking | |||
OT - Katrina and Insurance Claims | Metalworking | |||
Sony KV-20XBR, no R audio with signal | Electronics Repair | |||
Taking a audio signal and driving a DC Motor | Electronics |