http://rightwingwatch.org/content/re...-town-hall-fun
"As anybody who has been paying any attention knows, right-wing groups have
been busy urging activists to descend on Congressional "town hall" meetings
during the August recess and voice their opposition to health care
legislation, in some cases going so far as to encourage them to cause a
commotion in an effort to disrupt them..."

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:06:58 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

Irrelevant.

Yes, you are 100% irrelevant.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:06:58 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

Irrelevant.

Yes, you are 100% irrelevant.

UltimatePatriot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:06:58 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

Irrelevant.

Yes, you are 100% irrelevant.

More nothing from the nothing.

flipper wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:06:58 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

flipper wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:33:42 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

http://rightwingwatch.org/content/re...-town-hall-fun
"As anybody who has been paying any attention knows, right-wing
groups have been busy urging activists to descend on Congressional
"town hall" meetings during the August recess and voice their
opposition to health care legislation, in some cases going so far
as to encourage them to cause a commotion in an effort to disrupt
them..."


Unfortunately for any truth of the matter, 'think progress' (nice
joke) the originators of the 'leaked memo',

Sorry, they are not the originators of the leaked memo.

Your link cites them as the source.

No, my link cites a TeaPartyPatriot volunteer as the source.



have no actual proof that
these entities have any link one to the other at all. All TP has is
innuendo and assumption. It doesn't appear that the person that
supposedly wrote the memo is an employee of FreedomWorks nor is
FreedomWorks mentioned in any way in the supposedly leaked memo.

Irrelevant.

Obviously not to the guilt by innuendo left.

Apparently you're not smart enough to keep track of which side of an
argument you're on. The author is a TeaPartyPatriot VOLUNTEER, not
EMPLOYEE, and no organization needs to be mentioned in the memo. lol



The one whose name is signed to the memo, a Bob MacGuffie, seems to
be a "founding member" of Right Principles, a group that has
organized for tea party type events in Conn.

More importantly, a volunteer for "Tea Party Patriots" a
FreedomWorks website. lol

http://teapartypatriots.ning.com/profile/BobMacGuffie


Anyone can sign up, even you. Just go here

http://teapartypatriots.ning.com/mai...zation/signUp?

Then you can accuse them of being 'left wing'.

There's that wrong side of the argument thing again. lol




So how does Think (ha) Progress link the "leaked memo" to Freedom
works?

The memo above also resembles the talking points being
distributed by FreedomWorks for pushing an anti-health
reform assault all summer.

It "resembles" FreedomWorks' stuff? Um, wouldn't any talking points
that are about the same issue and coming from the same viewpoint
"resemble" each other at least in some ways? I mean, how different
can such talking points be anyway? I'd bet a dollar that any
CodePink talking points email would "resemble" MoveOn.org's memos.
wouldn't ya think? So, should we assume that the CodePinkos are the
MoveOn.orgers? Or can we safely assume they are different groups
even though they come from the same political end of the spectrum?

Nice hand-waving, you've got nothing here.

That's right, they have nothing. Which was the point.

IKYABWAI = usenet newbie fail.



Their claim stands as factual,

Their 'claim' that one is responsible for the actions of any, and
every, one who holds, at least in part, similar views

Made-up crazyassed crap.

(more of same snipped)

flipper wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:06:58 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

flipper wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:33:42 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:

http://rightwingwatch.org/content/re...-town-hall-fun
"As anybody who has been paying any attention knows, right-wing
groups have been busy urging activists to descend on Congressional
"town hall" meetings during the August recess and voice their
opposition to health care legislation, in some cases going so far
as to encourage them to cause a commotion in an effort to disrupt
them..."


Unfortunately for any truth of the matter, 'think progress' (nice
joke) the originators of the 'leaked memo',

Sorry, they are not the originators of the leaked memo.

Your link cites them as the source.

No, my link cites a TeaPartyPatriot volunteer as the source.



have no actual proof that
these entities have any link one to the other at all. All TP has is
innuendo and assumption. It doesn't appear that the person that
supposedly wrote the memo is an employee of FreedomWorks nor is
FreedomWorks mentioned in any way in the supposedly leaked memo.

Irrelevant.

Obviously not to the guilt by innuendo left.

Apparently you're not smart enough to keep track of which side of an
argument you're on. The author is a TeaPartyPatriot VOLUNTEER, not
EMPLOYEE, and no organization needs to be mentioned in the memo. lol



The one whose name is signed to the memo, a Bob MacGuffie, seems to
be a "founding member" of Right Principles, a group that has
organized for tea party type events in Conn.

More importantly, a volunteer for "Tea Party Patriots" a
FreedomWorks website. lol

http://teapartypatriots.ning.com/profile/BobMacGuffie


Anyone can sign up, even you. Just go here

http://teapartypatriots.ning.com/mai...zation/signUp?

Then you can accuse them of being 'left wing'.

There's that wrong side of the argument thing again. lol




So how does Think (ha) Progress link the "leaked memo" to Freedom
works?

The memo above also resembles the talking points being
distributed by FreedomWorks for pushing an anti-health
reform assault all summer.

It "resembles" FreedomWorks' stuff? Um, wouldn't any talking points
that are about the same issue and coming from the same viewpoint
"resemble" each other at least in some ways? I mean, how different
can such talking points be anyway? I'd bet a dollar that any
CodePink talking points email would "resemble" MoveOn.org's memos.
wouldn't ya think? So, should we assume that the CodePinkos are the
MoveOn.orgers? Or can we safely assume they are different groups
even though they come from the same political end of the spectrum?

Nice hand-waving, you've got nothing here.

That's right, they have nothing. Which was the point.

IKYABWAI = usenet newbie fail.



Their claim stands as factual,

Their 'claim' that one is responsible for the actions of any, and
every, one who holds, at least in part, similar views

Made-up crazyassed crap.

(more of same snipped)