On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:22:13 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
rweight.whores
wrote:

Cliff, , whose name means "hasn’t had the genital herpes
treated yet; enjoys getting **** mouthful from old men; likes to call his
penis his 'stocking stuffer'", ranted:

On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:32:58 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
wrote:

Cliff, , whose name means "droll, really droll;
needs cash so will **** or suck for peanuts", puled:

On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:23:47 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
wrote:

Cliff, , whose name means "limp-wristed
androdyke; has serious disabilities; still wears safari suits",
muttered:

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:57:06 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:27:24 -0400, Cliff
transparently proposed:

On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:35:26 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
greykitten tomys des anges wrote:

how important chromium steel is in things like armor
and jet turbine blades

AFAIK It's not at all involved in any jet turbine blades.
FYI.

Aluminum or used to be. Pretty much a sandwich now days.

Sorry, not in jet engine turbine blades. Some Titanium in some
of the fan & compressor blades though IIRC.

http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/phase-trans...peralloys.html

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH! From the page you so stupidly linked to:

"Commercial superalloys contain more than just Ni, Al and Ti.
Chromium and aluminium are essential..."

Did you happen to see "chromium steel" in there for jet engine
turbine blades?

So, let's get this right, eh. In order to successfully argue a case
against you, one must post a link to a webpage that explicitly
states that chromium steel is a component of jet turbine blades?

Happy hunting ..... leans back to take a looooong break

What? Are you awake? You were asked a direct question designed to ascertain
what your required level of proof is and examine its reasonableness,
therefore you assume someone is going to go looking for it?

You really are not clever, Cliffy.

You seem to be melting a bit about the edges.


Is that what you wish people to
believe?

You used that link to argue your presumed case. Too bad it said
nothing about chromium steel being used to make jet engine
turbine blades out of.

So, let's get this right, eh. In order to successfully argue a case
against you, one must post a link to a webpage that explicitly
states that chromium steel is a component of jet turbine blades?

Having fun looking?

Otherwise one might suspect that the cluesticks need to be
polished again.

BTW, Many of those alloys are NOT used in turbine blades.

Unsupported claim noted. Maybe you could post a link to a website
that explicitly states that those alloys are NOT used in turbine
blades. Hmmm?

Well, as you clearly are just guessing ....

Guessing what? That's yet another unsupported claim, Cliffy. Just how many
of theose do you expect to hope to get away with before people see you for
what you really are?

Not guessing?

Engines have many parts at a wide range of stresses & temps.

No, ****, Shylock? You know, when I first started work with Qantas
many years ago as a trainee jet propulsion engineer, I wish they'd
told me that.

Probably they should have.
BTW, Ever heard of GE or Pratt & Whitney?

Why do you persist in asking red-herring questions without addressing the
issues against you? Is it because you know you can't address the issues,
Cliffy?

GG.

I think

Clearly you do not.

I asked in another post if you know what groups you
are posting to VBG.

And I asked if knowing the NG's altered the validity of the case against you
in any way.

Giving up already???
--
Cliff