On 08/27/05 03:43 pm Duane Bozarth tossed the following ingredients into
the ever-growing pot of cybersoup:

So the purchasers of the software you write should obviously be writing
their own as they're paying for the business license of of your employer
as well as the secretary and your benefit and fringe package and the
machine and tools you're using to develop with.

Right! NOW I get it...

That's not the same.

It's EXACTLY the same...

... They are paying for a product and they are have to pay for R&D.
That goes for anything you buy off the shelf whether it is
software, a toilet valve, or an A/C. I am not complaining about the
price of building supplies, now.

You're paying for a product--that product is somebody's time and
expertise and their investment in their equivalent overhead costs--in
the trades that's tools, transportation, training, etc., etc., ...

I have done contract work where I had to go to the customer's site to
write software. But even then, we negotiated on a rate (time and
materials) and that's all I charged for. Granted my rate was very high
but they knew that going into the deal. So, I expect the same when some
workers come to my house to do work. I don't see the justice in paying
mexican's $150/hr to paint my house, which is about what it works out to
when you do the math.

Well, you go paint some houses for a living and see what you end up
charging as a working wage...

But according to the post that started all this, the plumber had quoted
his rate per hour, the material cost, and the length of the job, but the
total estimated price for the job was far more than the sum of these,
even allowing for it taking longer than estimated.

When we were living in NY and getting our car fixed and they told us
that the parts would cost $200 and it would take 3 hours labor at
$90/hr., do you think we would have been happy to end up with a bill for
$850?

That's the kind of thing that the OP was complaining about.

Perce