":::Jerry::::" wrote in message
eenews.net...

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article
s.net,
:::Jerry:::: wrote:
lug
behind, which is a pain to get at. A fused spur above, over
the
worktop,
with a fuse in, and the ring mcb, and then an RCD. They say we
overkill.
If there is a fault and the fuse blows behind the washing
machine?
They
thing it is silly to have a fuse in that plug, when a fused
spur
gives
protection above. I agree with them. I know some people who
remove the
fuse and put a copper wire across the washing machine plug, so
they
don't
have to drag the washing machine out. A good thing? Maybe not
as
the
appliance may be faulty.


That is one of the many failing with ring circuits I've tried to
illustrate, but the IEEE 'dinosaurs' just can't see the wood for
the
trees....

The only way you'd 'improve' on this would be to have one radial
circuit
per socket with its own MCB.

No, there is no need for one socket per radial,

That is obvious, but don't tell him.

Total madness and completely unnecessary.

You seem to thing plug fuses blow regularly. I can't honestly think
of the
last time I had to replace one which has failed for no reason. And
if an
appliance has a fault, that fault has to be corrected anyway, so it
makes
little difference if the fuse is in the plug, the appliance itself
or non
at all but simply an MCB.


It's not just about fuses blowing, it people using the wrong fuse,
for example protecting a table lamp with a 13A fuse,

Don't tell him.