"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:56:53 +0100, "Doctor Evil"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:30:39 +0100, "Doctor Evil"
wrote:


That is why Prescott is ramming them for more prefabbed techniques to
raise
quality levels and speed. The average brick and block UK house is far
too
labour intensive to erect. Far better methods are out there, but we
still
put tanks in lofts in this country, so what is chance of major change
in
building techniques and attitude.

I expect that the answer to that lies to some extent in your comment,
"Prescott is ramming them". People don't like to be rammed.

They will have to be rammed, as they will not change.

This assumes the need for change.

You are naive.

The government has no
option.

The government always has an option.
Keeping out of people's affairs
would be a good one.

Keeping out of housing and land and allowing the free market to rule, with
no more Draconian planning laws allowing people to build in open countryside
and have land not in the hands of a few mainly aristocratic people. In that
I agree with you. Get that right and the government will be involved in
housing far less.

The UK construction industry is a joke,
and other countries laugh at us.

Documented evidence?

You really don't know do you?