On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:55:50 -0800, (Floyd L.
Davidson) wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:45:27 -0800, (Floyd L.
Davidson) wrote:

John Fields wrote:
I'm not talking about what _I_ want to read, ...

In fact, that's all you *ever* talk about.

And "nashing" of teeth??? Tsk, tsk, tsk...

Perfect example!

---
Learn to use the language and its subtleties properly if you want to
be considered learned or, at the very least, competent in American
English.

The omission of the 'g' at the beginning of 'nashing' is inexcusable
and marks you as a churl.

Spelling flames, John, just *do* become you perfectly!

---
Flame or not, the fact remains that you posit yourself as an arbiter
of the proper use of the language and yet clumsily (and helplessly, it
seems) make errors which belie your claim. I like to point them out
because they're just another example of your hypocrisy and I wouldn't
want you to think that your bull**** went undetected.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer