In message , Signal
writes
"Sue Begg" emitted :

I pot smoking acquaintance was seen in the supermarket scrutinising the
labels on cans because he didn't want any of those chemicals in his food
- presumably chemicals are only harmful if ingested not smoked

Do you suggest your acquaintance *actively* seek chemicals in his
food, to supplement the ones he's already exposing himself to? ;-)



S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
Attack Decay Sustain Release....

I think the amount of chemical he voluntarily exposed his body to, the
additives in his food would be irrelevant. It was noticeable that he
never checked whisky for chemicals. - But he is a lovely bloke all the
same :-)
--
Sue Begg
Remove my clothes to reply

Do not mess in the affairs of dragons - for
you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup!