Brian G wrote:

If the driver drives off with his/her vision obviously obstructed, then
he/she is at fault and is in fact commiting an offence.

That may or may not be the case... however he may try to clear it "as
best he can" (not having hot soapy water to hand) and then drive off.
Only to find it is actually more of a hindrance than anticipated when he
runs over a small child he did not see.

He may be "in the wrong" legally. However there is now a two dimensional
infant that got that way only because of your actions with the pritt
stick. How do you feel about that?

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/