View Single Post
  #27   Report Post  
Scott Kaczorowski
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"J. Clarke" wrote in
:

newcastle wrote:

Nate Nagel wrote:
wrote:

First ... to answer the thread question. HELL NO. Too
spicey and pricey.


To answer the original question with a question: What BBC
beer are you talking about? If Boston Lager, then, yes, it's
a good beer. It is well-made (under contract), it's flavors
include the ol' time favorite hops in both flavor and aroma,
but malt also exerts her presence (in a good way, and not the
Crystal mess that is, thankfully, disappearing from the
typical brewpub red ale (leastways 'round here)).

Comparable to Arrogant ******* Ale?

http://www.arrogant*******.com/

It tastest like dog ****,


Thank you for that. Pure crap in a bottle.

but man it'll get you high.

Try it at cellar temperature instead of chilled.


Arrogant ******* and Double ******* suck no matter what you
do to them. "Cellar temps"... How 'bout the liberal
application of cherry extract followed by a small dose of
lactic acid followed by the conversion of AB/DB from a means-
to-a-buzz to something the local treatment plant has to deal
with? Both are no better than stupid homebrewer tricks. The
bottle is bitchin', but...

d


Who?


SClasdfhqrwt q163v012u0o
qew
]f5237op28nyutrt s
CA, qlwerqw4qtn 2yloy45u hol yewlrtuyht ****ityhnbqlwruewo
yghqro4u qewrewljjl