brugnospamsia wrote:
....
And one can only wonder at the image quality of such a low-priced camera.

If it's like the cheap mi*rk one I bought last year, it'll be ghastly.
Very poor focus and resolution, the built-in infrared leds are all but
useless, and the dark picture is incredibly noisy. Also the AGC seems
to turn down the gain as the brightness drops :-) I'd say it was
optimized for about 8-10 ft viewing distance. Maybe. Certainly not
useful for general property surveillance - and I'm glad I only bought it
to try out some motion detection ideas.

--
Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies.
Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from
various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk
regards. Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk)