Gunner wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:03:13 -0800, Tom wrote:

Gunner wrote:

On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:25:53 -0800, Tom wrote:

Gunner wrote:

On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:51:49 -0800, Tom wrote:


Cone pulleys are NOT cone drives Tom...a horse of a much different
color.

Gunner

Like the person who brought cone drives you can't read what Jim posted!

He posted:
"If I really wanted a *true* variable speed lathe, I would purchase
a cone pulley machine and fit it with a three phase motor and a VFD."

Tom

Yes and? It still remains that cone drives are NOT cone pullys.

Your point was?

Gunner

You're got the comprehension skills of the person who introduced
cone drives to the thread, bugger all.

Tom

I ask again..your point was?

Gunner

You made a statement:
"It still remains that cone drives are NOT cone pullys."

Yes. Its quite true.

Prove it in the context of the post in which cone pulley
lathes were first mentioned.

Why?

Tom

Gunner

Why?