Let's call it quits, Nate. I can see from your party affiliation that
you can't/won't be convinced of anything because you can't get past the
"hate Bush" thing (and don't tell me you liked Bush before the war, I
know you didn't vote for him). As far as googling you, why on Earth
would I bother? I don't want to know your life history, we are just
having a discussion. Online, anybody who says things like "funny,
that" has a good chance of being a Brit. The idea that Bush was
justifying the war based on Saddam taking part in 9/11 is simply
foolish and I put 2 and 2 together and figured you must be getting
filtered news in Britan.

I'm not going to try and convince you of anything. I have to figure
someday in the far, far future a light bulb will go on somewhere in CO.

Oh, last thing. I have no relatives in the military so I guess I'm
incapable of having a reasoned position. You are starting to look like
a Micheal Moore type. 1400 dead? Even 1 is a sad day for that's
person's family, but 1400 is less than half of the number who died on
9/11. I'd also like to know the normal casualty rate over a two year
period for military personnel. They do die even in peacetime. Odd,
that.

dwhite