Gunner wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:25:53 -0800, Tom wrote:
Gunner wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:51:49 -0800, Tom wrote:
Cone pulleys are NOT cone drives Tom...a horse of a much different
color.
Gunner
Like the person who brought cone drives you can't read what Jim posted!
He posted:
"If I really wanted a *true* variable speed lathe, I would purchase
a cone pulley machine and fit it with a three phase motor and a VFD."
Tom
Yes and? It still remains that cone drives are NOT cone pullys.
Your point was?
Gunner
You're got the comprehension skills of the person who introduced
cone drives to the thread, bugger all.
Tom
Your blind dislike for me is about as much concern to me as the
antics of a single cell protozoa living in a mouses gut.
Gunner
It not a dislike, just that you put your typing into
gear without actually comprehending what you are
responding to. "Cone drives" had absolutely nothing
to do with what Jim posted. I notice that the person who
erroneously made the conneection, has about as much backbone
as you, when admitting to errors.
Tom
|