"mark" wrote in message
...

"Swingman" wrote in message
...
"mark" wrote in message

other in place, but there was a definite change in the dynamics of the
sound.

First, define the phrase "dynamics of the sound".


Hard to explain. It sounded wider, more expanded. I'm no expert, my
stereo
cost 500 bucks.

LOL

Not trying to gig you ... but countless hours behind a recording console has
given me some experience in interpreting the sound "desires" of clients,
and, more to the point, the terminology they use to describe what they hear,
or want to hear.

It's when they mix actual technical terms, as you did, like "dynamic" (the
"dynamic" range of a recording is defined as the difference between the
softest and the loudest passage) with terms like "wider" and "expanded", is
when the fun begins.

"fat", "over-the-top", "warm", "open", "wide", "expanded", "dynamic" "edgy",
and even (more from females) "red", "green" and "blue", are just some of the
adjectives musicians use to convey what they hear/want to hear.

"Can you make that guitar a bit more/less warm, open and dynamic ... and can
you make if fatter and more edgy without being boomy?"

.... is one I've heard a lot.

Again, I am not trying to gig you in particular, just illustrating a point.


I personally won't spend the kind of money we're talking about based on that
type of subjective analysis ... which is generally all you get, even as a
basis of these type of claims from the manufacturer.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 11/06/04