|
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:04:37 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:
Cliff wrote:
You posted "No, you're trying to blame everything except the simple
fact that more people wanted Bush in power than gore." which
would be the popular vote, right?
To which I responded: "Any idea who won the popular vote?"
Bush got a total of 50,456,002 (47.87%) and Gore got a total
of 50,999,897 (48.38%).
So you have to take a thread ON THE SIX FLORIDA RECOUNTS, and
reinterpret it to mean "national popular vote"?
The thread seems to be titled "OT - "Cites" for Gunner".
YOU said "more people wanted Bush in power than gore",
not I VBG.
Don't the votes count? Don't you?
Typical democrap bull****.
Too bad that you don't like how the popular vote came out
or democracy.
Or were you talking about being able to actually count or know
which number is larger?
Oh, I know, you made a mistake. You weren't really*trying* to
bull**** anyone.
IF you think that the numbers are in error take it up with those
that counted the votes. Or the shrubbie's lawyers that got the
feared recounts stopped so many times.
This clearly demonstrates that YOUR statement "the simple
fact that more people wanted Bush in power than gore."
is in fact a lie.
So you're still saying that gore won the six recounts?
50,999,897 50,456,002
Like I said, idiot, feel free to disprove that anytime you want.
50,999,897 50,456,002
Do you winger always lie?
Do you democraps always bull****?
50,999,897 50,456,002
I already know well which half you are in. And that
you know nothing of the subject or the function Y=e((-X)**2).
Function? Doesn't take any function to understand that "half the
populatinon has an IQ below 100" is only possibly true if there are
none that are 100....and since the national average *is* 100 and Mr.
Bell called you an idiot, too.....
Can you count to 100?
Do you know what decimals are?
ral
--
Cliff
You need to learn how to post.
--
Cliff
|