On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:41:33 GMT, (Richard
Lewis) wrote:

Cliff wrote:

Ummm .. what does that have to do with your claim that
Herr shrubbie won the popular vote against Gore?

Now you resort to lies, dude?

You were the one who raised the "popular vote" issue. I said in the
six recounts, Bush won all of them.

You posted "No, you're trying to blame everything except the simple
fact that more people wanted Bush in power than gore." which
would be the popular vote, right?

To which I responded: "Any idea who won the popular vote?"
Bush got a total of 50,456,002 (47.87%) and Gore got a total
of 50,999,897 (48.38%).

To my way of thinking 50,999,897 is a larger number than
50,456,002 and 48.38% is larger than 47.87%.

This clearly demonstrates that YOUR statement "the simple
fact that more people wanted Bush in power than gore."
is in fact a lie.

Do you winger always lie?


Feel free to disprove that any time you feel like it.

See how very simple it is to catch wingers in lies?

Then they lie about telling the lies ...... no actual
facts needed in *their* stupid claims, just "Prove it's
not so."

The National Bird of wingers:
http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscart...es/jcan15l.jpg


Evasion or confusion?


That one simple fact still trumps all the whining and crying the dems
have been doing.

Half the populatinon has an IQ below 100. Those the ones
that voted for the shrubbie? Felt right at home?

They do not....

Which half are you "thinking" of?

The one named "Bell". You should get to know him before making such
bull**** statements. Stops you from looking like an idiot.

ral

I already know well which half you are in. And that
you know nothing of the subject or the function Y=e((-X)**2).
--
Cliff