Thread: Part P (again)
View Single Post
  #33   Report Post  
coherers
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Andy Hall" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:29:30 GMT, "coherers"
wrote:

The Part P Approved Document seems to take that view. From section 0.8
quote
When the non-notifiable work
described in Table 1 [i.e Schedule 2B] is to be
undertaken by a DIY worker, a
way of showing compliance would
be to follow the IEE guidance or
guidance in other authoritative
manuals that are based on this,
and to have a competent person
inspect and test the work and
supply a Minor Electrical
Installation Works Certificate. The
competent person need not
necessarily be registered with an
electrical self-certification scheme
but, as required by BS 7671, must
be competent in respect of the
inspection and testing of an
installation
/quote

Note the use of the word "compliance". The regs apply even for minor

DIY.So
if we don't want to get a certified "professional" to check our stuff, we
will have to do ourselves certificates !


This is as I understand it, but do remember that the Approved
Documents do not have the force of law - they are simply a guideline.


Right - there is a tendency for the Approved documents to "extend" the law,
which really irritates me 'cos there are enough real regulations without
f***head's office inventing them

So the quote above can be nothing more than a recommendation, and is
in effect the status quo today.

There is one big change in the status quo. Currently, if we add a socket and
skimp on the inspection/testing, we may end on the wrong side of the civil
law. After 1st Jan, if we do anything which doesn't comply with regs, we
could end up with a criminal record ( s35, Building Act 1984).

Ditto for the professionals though, which might be the silver lining....