View Single Post
  #89   Report Post  
Joe Gorman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maxprop wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message


In article , Joe Gorman




Prescription. They were supposed to be safety lenses, according
to the optometrist who sold them. I don't go there anymore.



Sounds like you might want to talk to a lawyer. At the minimum, if I were

in

your shoes, I'd be looking for the optometrist to pay for the medical
treatment and a replacement pair of glasses.



I tuned into this thread a bit late, but perhaps I can be of some help. As
an optometrist, I can at least shed some light on the problem with the
lens--which appears to have broken due to impact, if I'm extrapolating
correctly--or at least with why it didn't protect the eye. Please feel free
to inquire.

As to seeking legal help, that should be a last resort effort. As soon as
you retain an attorney, any cooperation between the doctor and the patient
evaporates, by instruction from the doctor's lawyer. Most problems can be
worked out without dragging the issue into a legal environment.



Keep in mind, also, that even safety prescription glasses don't afford as


much

protection as safety goggles do, because the lenses are smaller. Like you,


I

also wear prescription eyeglasses, and goggles are often a PITA (for those
who don't wear eyeglasses, if you do, goggles often make your glasses fog


up,

and it's easy to knock your eyeglasses askew when taking the goggles on


and

off).



Contrary to popular belief, safety glasses really provide very little
protection against impacts of significant velocity and/or mass. At best
they will keep flying particles and tiny objects out of the wearer's eyes,
but are limited in effect with respect to heavy objects flying at
significant velocities. Crown glass safety lenses are really no better than
CR-39 hard resin (plastic) lenses made for non-safety glasses, and most
likely worse. The best lenses are polycarbonate, but their ability to
resist significant impact is limited by the ability of the frame to hold the
lens in place without releasing the lens or collapsing under the impact.
Polycarbonate generally won't break or shatter. And you are correct w/r/t
goggles--they offer superior eye protection. So do polycarbonate face
shields.



About five years ago, I switched to using a face shield, and I'll never go
back to goggles. The face shield never fogs up, and I've never bumped my
eyeglasses with it, even once. It's so easy, and so quick, to put on, that


I

use it *far* more than I ever used goggles, which increases the safety


factor

that much more. Another bonus: there are other things on your face,


besides

your eyes, that deserve protection: how'd you like to have a table saw or


a

lathe throw a chunk of wood into your teeth?



Fine advice.

Max





Well, it was a few years ago so the lawyer is out. I had been
clearing the chunks at the beginning. I was trimming a bunch of
poplar 2x2's and got tired of moving the scraps off the table.
After all they were just sitting there. Then one jiggled just far
enough for the rear tooth of the blade to toss it at me. I tend
to have a little retroactive amnesia whenever something like this
happens so the next thing I remember was holding one hand over the
damaged eye and looking for the glasses with the other eye. Found
the glasses, picked up the lens pieces and went for a ride.
Joe