On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:32:57 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:16:35 GMT, ah wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:51:14 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:50:50 GMT, ah wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:01:48 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 09:54:39 GMT, ah wrote:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:08:14 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Things being equal, yes.

If DC were used in the applications currently occupied by AC, the
deletirious effects would be more frequent, and obvious.

Agreed. But you said DC was SAFER.

Relatively speaking, yes: you can't get fried by touching the
connection on a damn remote-control, model car!

Hmmmmm I assumed you were comparing like with like! Electric railways
are 400 volts DC for example :-)

But car batteries are not.

And they aren't like.

Yes?
--
ah