On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:16:35 GMT, ah wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:51:14 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:50:50 GMT, ah wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:01:48 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 09:54:39 GMT, ah wrote:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:08:14 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Things being equal, yes.

If DC were used in the applications currently occupied by AC, the
deletirious effects would be more frequent, and obvious.

Agreed. But you said DC was SAFER.

Relatively speaking, yes: you can't get fried by touching the
connection on a damn remote-control, model car!

Hmmmmm I assumed you were comparing like with like! Electric railways are
400 volts DC for example :-)

But car batteries are not.

And they aren't like.


--
*****TWO BABY CONURES***** 16 parrots and increasing http://www.petersparrots.com
93 silly video clips http://www.insanevideoclips.com
1259 digital photos http://www.petersphotos.com

My nephew and I were playing a game of chess tonight. In desperation he mockingly tried to cheat. In a poor imitation of an Italian gangster I said, "You want I should beat you up?"
He replied in turn, "I'll kill you first."
"Ah," I replied. "The Sicilian Defense."