On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:51:14 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:50:50 GMT, ah wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:01:48 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 09:54:39 GMT, ah wrote:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:08:14 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:52:24 GMT, ah wrote:

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:30:49 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Yes.

You seemed to imply DC was safer earlier.

Things being equal, yes.

If DC were used in the applications currently occupied by AC, the
deletirious effects would be more frequent, and obvious.

Agreed. But you said DC was SAFER.

Relatively speaking, yes: you can't get fried by touching the
connection on a damn remote-control, model car!

Hmmmmm I assumed you were comparing like with like! Electric railways are
400 volts DC for example :-)

But car batteries are not.
--
ah