Gunner wrote:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:33:04 GMT, Dale Scroggins
wrote:


Anyway, Gunner, the answer to both your questions is "yes". I may have
anticipated some other questions. What do you believe now, and why?

Dale Scroggins


At this point, I shall take a wait and see stance.

Im still wondering why the daughter and wife of the gent in question
state categorically that those are frauds.

Gunner

I saw reports of statements by the widow and a son. Didn't see anything
about a daughter; widow and son said, as I recall, it was unfair to
pick out things the "gent" wrote thirty years ago and broadcast them
when he couldn't put his statements in context. Valid point, but
uncorrectable. After we die, things we wrote down are likely to be
taken at face value.

Widow avows he wasn't a typist. Didn't discuss likelihood of a clerk or
secretary.

Didn't see anything from either the widow or the son claiming direct
knowledge that the documents were forged. Just general sentiment.
Widow admits he left some other documents around, but she really hasn't
looked for them.

Dale Scroggins