On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:00:28 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:32:28 +0800, Old Nick
calmly ranted:

On 24 Aug 2004 19:25:25 GMT, (Charles A.
Sherwood) vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

I figured that the big grinder would act like a rotary phase
converter for the dust collector, but I don't see any current
in the third leg with a clamp on ampmeter.

So to penetration, lubricant, heat, flow, affected zones, I can now
add "amount of current in the third leg".

He's obviously never peed on a 'lectric fence.

nnnnnhhhhhhgh! I have touched one a couple of times, and well.....

No wonder metalwork is more fun than sex. G

Ooh, you _are_ getting old, Nick.

Maybe I peed on an electric fence once! G

rrgh! Makes me me feel quite ummmm...well, there's a significant
pucker factor there! errreghgr!

Actually I was thinking of the guy who was here a while make (Mike I
think?) whose SO was lambasting him about not keeping in touch, on
this forum. With all these terms popping up, I always thought she had
no hope.
************************************************** ***
I have decided that I should not be offended by
anybody's behaviour but my own......the theory's
good, anyway.