On Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:20:11 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

snip

A cow that would not have been bred if you didn't want milk is killed
at the end of its productive years. You're as culpable as the meat eater.

No, because if x cows are to be killed to provide the required meat for meat eaters, x cows will still die if milk is taken first. You can only blame milk drinkers once there are no meat eaters.

Again, that's assuming ex dairy cows end up in the same place as the
cows normally killed for flesh to be consumed by humans and they
generally aren't.

Many dairy calves are killed immediately and probably go into pet
food.

Many dairy calves are killed under a year old and go to human
consumption as 'rose veal'.

Dairy cows might be killed at 5-7 years and again, probably go to pet
food.

It makes no sense killing one animal to feed another, especially if
it's not necessary.

But the issue isn't only (or mainly) the death when it comes to dairy
cows it's also the so called 'life'.

Having to be artificially inseminated every year (being arse fisted to
move the cervix and then semen injected from a wanked off bull), to
having it's calf taken away (every year) causing stress / distress to
both the cow and it's calf to the constantly having to carry around
10x the quantity of milk it would ever do in nature with them
regularly suffering mastitis and all the pain that involves.

https://ibb.co/XVHHvxf

And all for humans to drink the growth fluid created only for cows and
denied to their own young, humans who have often long since weaned and
where 60% of the world population are still intolerant to?

Please explain to me where any of that sounds 'good' to you, compared
with 'just' mixing some oats with water ... ?

https://youtu.be/FM95_k9onEc

Cheers, T i m