On 29/05/2021 12:07, T i m wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 29/05/2021 10:46, T i m wrote:
Spike wrote:

There is no point arguing with you because you have no interest (or
ability) to comprehend the *actual* events and the spirit of the post.

It is nonsense when you recall that your original point was "eating meat
causes antibiotic resistance in viruses",

That was no more than a brain fart.

Correct me if I'm wrong

What would be the point, you would never accept it?

Laughable.

but I think this is your *fourth* different
excuse for making the mistake that "eating meat causes antibiotic
resistance in viruses", You're now resorting to calling on 'the spirit'
for support, although it's not obvious whether this lives in the sky or
comes out of a bottle.

Told you. Grow up ... you are pathetic.

I don't need to fall back on a 'spirit', whether it's from the sky or a
bottle,

Perhaps, when you've sorted yourself out, you might let us know which
excuse was the correct one.

See above.

So, you remain confused by your own mistakes.

*The point*, was, and always has been the FACT that humanity has
suffered some level of antibiotic resistance *because* of the
consumption of such from animal flesh that was given to the animal
when alive. Fact. Full Stop.

Anyone trying to divert the point away from that fact is and can only
be a pathetic troll or sad left brainer.

Well, you didn't start from there, did you?

You started from the unfortunate premise that "meat eating causes
antibiotic resistance in viruses". Anyone trying to divert the point
away from that fact is and can only be a pathetic troll or sad left brainer.

I know you are both (because they are often intertwined).

Back in the box for you, pathetic troll.

How quaint. Time for your sundowner?


--
Spike