View Single Post
  #155   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Clare Snyder Clare Snyder is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,564
Default OT. Ford Lightning. Battery F150

On Sun, 23 May 2021 03:11:32 +1000, "Joey" wrote:



"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
...
On 5/21/2021 10:56 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2021 21:45:41 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 5/21/2021 7:53 PM, Joey wrote:


"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message


No the grid is not up to it. Will it ever be if not pushed into it?
CA can't even keep the lights on at night

So it makes no sense at all to be charging lots of EVs at night.

Wow. Just wow.

He has a point. There is no solar at night and less wind. Having
everyone charging at the same time isn't a good idea either. If we
replace ICEs with electrics we'll need a lot more generating capacity.
Everyone doing it at the same time will make things even worse.


No simple answer


Yes there is, nukes.

but we need more non fossil fueled power plants.


And they should be nukes, not stupid wind farms
which don’t provide reliable power and **** the
environment and not solar farms which only
produce enough electricity for a part of the day.

Once demand is there,


It already is, almost everyone heats their
house in winter and most cool it in summer.

supply can and will be built. The worst thing to do is nothing.


No one who matters is suggesting doing nothing.

With CA forcing people into EVs they have to support them.


Bet they don’t and the whole thing ends
up a complete shambles like it is now.
Because they are doing the wrong thing.

Same as gas stations grew over the past 100 years.


Nothing like that in fact. That was never done centrally.



NUKES are NOT the ANSWER They are just the start of the question.
Where are you going to put the nukes????
Nobody will allow them to be be built within a thousand miles of them.
Even the extremely "safe" and reliable CANDU systems.

Australia has NO nukes.
64% of their power is from COAL