In alt.home.repair, on Sat, 22 May 2021 12:31:58 -0400, Retirednoguilt
wrote:

On 5/22/2021 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Saturday, May 22, 2021 at 11:19:04 AM UTC-4, Retirednoguilt wrote:
On 5/22/2021 10:23 AM, Frank wrote:
On 5/22/2021 10:01 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
On 5/21/2021 5:30 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2021-05-21, micky wrote:
And there you go, proving what I expected. There have been
150,000,000
-- One hundred fifty million vaccinations -- and NO blood clots for
Moderna or Pfizer, and only about 18 for Johnson and Johnson.

It has only been a few months. The idea that this is enough time to
"prove"
these experimental, non-approved vaccines are "safe" is nonsensical
in the
extreme. I won't be vaccinated any time soon.


You need to appreciate relative risk. The risk of getting a blood
clot complication from an mRNA vaccine is far lower than the risk of
getting a serious/fatal case of COVID. Besides, please define your
criterion for "enough time"; and how is 0/150,000,000 an unsafe track
record?

There is risk in everything. I have also mentioned that clots are a
common risk killing more people than breast cancer. One nearly did me
in over 20 years ago and had to be surgically removed. The surgeon told
me his father died from a clot.

Covid itself presents a higher clot risk than the vaccine and apparently
are common so if he wants to get his clots from covid that is his choice.
However, his choice is severely endangering all immunocompromised
people, those who were vaccinated but failed to get an adequate immune
response, and all those who also are unvaccinated for various medical,
logistical, and perverse reasons. Actually, unvaccinated people place
everyone at risk because every additional infection increases the risk
of a new mutant variety that may be resistant to the existing vaccines
and the unvaccinated are far more likely to become infected than almost
all of us who are presently fully vaccinated.

The right-wing version of personal responsibility. If those people wanted
to live, they shouldn't have become immunocompromised or whatever their
problem is. /s

Cindy Hamilton


You incessantly demonstrate your ignorance. Most people who are
immununocompromised are cancer patients who are receiving or have
received chemotherapy, have inborn genetic abnormalities either
inherited or from a mutation, are taking immunosupressive medication to
tolerate an organ transplant or to treat severe cases of diseases with a
strong immune system malfunction such as severe ulcerative colitis,
rheumatoid arthritis, or lupus. You'd sing a different song if you were
in one of those categories. None have been found to correlate with
lifestyle choices. You speak of personal responsibility; if you were
willing to take responsibility, you'd do a little research and learn
something about a topic before spouting garbage.

Whoosh!

And I believe " /s " means 'sarcasm off'. Which implies it was on.

When I'm sarcastic, I don't even include /s.