View Single Post
  #33   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y,alt.home.repair
Paul[_46_] Paul[_46_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 870
Default Most absurd lie on a product

Larry wrote:
On 5/12/21 5:15 AM, Steve Walker wrote:


A vaccine is not like a medicine though. Typically vaccine
side-effects will be seen soon after vaccination and are immune system
reactions to it and once the vaccine has been eliminated from the body
there are no more effects. They contain killed or weakened virus or,
now, an artificial creation with just enough similarity to the virus
that the immune system can learn the characteristics

Medications are taken for longer periods, have much wider effect and
can cause cumulative damage.

I'd much rather have a new vaccine than a new medication.



People are clotting/dying from the experimental gene therapy so it's
clearly not safe.
And Fony Fauci claims the "vaccinated" still need to wear a mask so
apparently the experimental gene therapy is not effective either.
I'm pretty certain this Fauci prick is lying to us.


At the beginning, there were around 110 or more projects to
produce a virus. The methodology varies, but there might
have been a half dozen different forms. One of our national
news sites, had a long web page, tracking the various
approaches. The reason so many projects took off, was
to try to find something effective. When you read the article
on RNA_Vaccine, you can see based on its research history,
what a long shot it was.

For a summary of the successful and still-born efforts,
see this article.

https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/coro...accinetracker/

*******

The AZ one seems to have a higher risk of clotting, than occurs
naturally in humans. There are enough clotting problems in humans,
before COVID came along, we have a national lab set up here which
does nothing but "genetic tests for clotting conditions". If you're
prone to such conditions, that lab can give a diagnosis so the
doctor knows you've got a problem that needs careful attention.
You can have a genetic predisposition to abnormal clotting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford...VID-19_vaccine

using as a vector the modified chimpanzee adenovirus ChAdOx1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenoviridae

adenoviral serotypes ... (known as the common cold)

The adenovirus is also modified so it cannot reproduce.
The only exception is some question about the Russian Sputnik,
where there are two adenoviruses, and one of them may not
have been quiesced properly. You might have symptoms of a
cold in that case, The Brazilians rejected Sputnik recently.
The Russians don't agree with their analysis. I don't know
if any other country or body is interested in repeating
the Brazilian analysis or not, as verification. This
represents a violation of protocol, rather than a clear
and present danger. You're not supposed to make vaccines
that way.

*******

The Pfizer is a (messenger) RNA one. That's different than DNA, which
is what makes your cells work. Work on the concept started in 1990
(that's to give time to collect all the three-eyed fish as a byproduct).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_vaccine#Mechanism

"mRNA vaccines do not affect or reprogram DNA inside the cell.
The synthetic mRNA fragment is a copy of the specific part
of the viral RNA that carries the instructions to build
the antigen of the virus (a protein spike, in the case of
the main coronavirus mRNA vaccines), and is not related
to human DNA. This misconception was circulated as the
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines came to public prominence, and
is a debunked conspiracy theory."

At least one of the two mRNA ones, there were patients with
clotting, but the rate was the same as the rate for
the general population who had not received a vaccine.
Whereas the AZ one, the rate of clot for that is higher
than background. And it looks like the Germans were
likely right, in their estimate of the clot rate for AZ.

Paul