On 12/05/2021 12:28, T i m wrote:
On 12 May 2021 10:51:14 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 12 May 2021 at 11:16:54 BST, Spike wrote:

On 12/05/2021 08:05, T i m wrote:

Plus non-milks don't need to be homogenised so any potential risks
associated with that are eliminated and they contain 90% less
cholesterol etc.

As homo sapiens has, in the same way that it has developed a gene for
lactose digestion, developed to generate its own cholesterol (a vital
substance) as well as digest it from consumed foods, why do you seem to
think a 90% reduction in a minor artificially-processed consumable is a
good thing?

Perhaps T r o l l is also unaware that the body needs cholesterol, and if it
doesn't have enough in the diet, then it makes its own.

So it doesn't *need* it externally then?

And didn't I say there was *no* cholesterol in plant based milks did
I? How much do you get from other sources?

Once again you are desperately clawing for *any* reason to try to
argue with me to defend your continuing justification of the
unnecessary suffering and death of innocent, sentient creatures.

It's the same as the argument against veganism based on protein or
B12, it's all bollox for anyone taking care of what they eat (which
should be everyone).

Please confirm why many vegans say honey is not suitable for vegans.

Some say that by replacing honey with sugar syrup is bad for the bees'
health.
https://justbeehoney.co.uk/blogs/jus...is-honey-vegan

In much the same way I wouldn't want to remove meat and meat products
from my loved one's diet because of the known and unknown consequences.

In addition to B12, who knows what vegans lack in their diet, especially
the effect it might have on growing children. There is anecdotal
evidence it can promote fanaticism.