Thread: Can we agree...
View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Fredxx[_4_] Fredxx[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,591
Default Can we agree...

On 25/04/2021 11:36, T i m wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 07:27:37 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 24/04/2021 18:35, Bev wrote:
...that T i m knows everything, is always correct in what he says and
that no amount of help and information will ever persuade him otherwise.

That way we can all save time and effort in responding to his requests
for information when he ignores it anyway as it does not fit with his pre-
conceived ideas.

Been on my filter for ages.


Because you have been a coward for ages, preferring to throw stones
over the wall than face me directly. I can't blame you though, given
you generally have **** all else.


That's a bit rich coming from you. You can never justify many aspects of
the twaddle you spout and throw abuse every time you've lost your argument.

T i m has a bad case of 'One True Stick'-ness. The delusion that one
single personal *interpretation* of the world is, in fact, the
world-in-itself, as Kant put it.


That might be the case if it were true, but as with most things you
state about me (because you are too petrified to sat 'to' me), it's
complete bollox.

If we are on the subject of veganism, I am only one and was far from
the first who knows our treatment of a subset of species is not only
(very) bad for them (especially considering it's also completely
unnecessary in most cases) but bad for us as well, as conformed by all
the medial bodies, all the environmental bodies and all the animal
rights bodies.


Really "conformed by all the medial bodies"?

As an aside, dieticians are quick to point out the deficiencies of a
vegan diet.

So the irony here it is you who are different, countering the common
thought and direction, but such is the way for basement dwelling
trolls desperate to protect their selfish way of life.


Another sign you've lost the plot resorting to abuse, not the sort of
thing you'd say to NP's face.

It is a condition that many vaguely intelligent people suffer from. It
doesn't afflict the truly thick, because they know they are truly thick
and don't pay their minds as much attention. It doesn't afflict the
truly intelligent, because they realise that their worldview is, in the
end, only a view.


Bwhahahahaha!! OMG, if there was ever a statement of Turnip putting
himself on some pedestal, that was it!


Is that agreement that you're too thick to realise you're thick?

But it afflicts the middle orders and their third rate brains alarmingly...


Aw bless ... and that's the best he's got unfortunately. ;-(


The truth hurts.

Hence Marxism, Socialism,


Strawmen.

Veganism,


Consideration for the animals we share this rock with and we are
dependent on in many cases (for our existence, not even to consume /
exploit).


If you had consideration for animals you would care about their welfare
while they're alive, and not show an insane jealousy of us eating them
when they no longer have a care in the world.

Environmentalism,


Consideration for the rock we all have to share and breath the air on
and drink the water from and are dependant on for our existence.

Wokeism, Religious
fundamentalism...


Strawmen.


Hardly when you are the very definition of fanaticism.