On 4/22/2021 7:16 AM, Ward wrote:
On 4/22/21 1:27 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:57:45 GMT, (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:

writes:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:28:25 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 4/21/2021 8:00 AM, trader_4 wrote:
.
Ed, that's exactly what I thought.Â* I can't recall another case
where the charges
ranged from manslaughter to murder and they convicted them of all
three.
That must be something peculiar to Minnesota.

As to appeals, if there is still justice in America, he should be
granted a new
trial.Â* That trial never should have been held in Minneapolis, it
was impossible
for him to get a fair trial there.Â*Â* The jury was under the gun,
knew that if they
acquitted, the mobs would be burning down their city.Â* Maxine
Waters, always
the fool and despicable, added to it by calling for violence while
the trial was
going on, if he was acquitted.Â*Â* Another thing that should not
have been allowed
was all the tearful testimony of what a great guy that POS Floyd
was.Â* The
prosecution brought up one witness after another, portraying him
as a kind,
loving, beautiful guy.Â*Â*Â* That left the defense in a terrible
position.Â* What could
they do, go cross examine them and ask what about the fact that he
held a
knife to a pregnant woman during a home invasion and all his other
arrests?
If they did, then the jury could feel that the defense was
attacking a dead man.
I'm not saying Chauvin was innocent, but there is no way that sham
was a
fair trial and I hope he gets a new trial.Â*Â* All kinds of trials
have been granted
changes of venue for far less poisonous environments than existed
here.

With all the publicity it would be difficult to try him anywhere and
Maxine would follow.

They did not name the jurors of course, but you can be sure they were
known to the locals.Â* A non-guilty could have had their houses burned
down too.

Every big city seems to have a mural of Floyd now.Â* They should
also put
up a of his arrests with it to keep it in perspective.Â* He is not a
hero
or role model.
That is what bothers me. There are far more egregious police
shootings. Breonna Taylor springs to mind but they had video of Floyd
so the TV embraced it in spite of the fact that he was a thug that was
fighting with the police and refused to get in the car.
Mr Floyd could have stopped this at any time by saying "I give up, I
will get in the car".
Why do people always embrace these thugs?
Because murder is murder even if one is an -accused- thug.Â* We only
legally murder people after they've been convicted by a jury of their
peers.Â* Resisting arrest is not a capital crime.
Mr Floyd was an accessory to that murder. He could have given up and
got in the car at any time. Nobody ever heard him say it tho.


At autopsy, they found our hero had 3x the lethal dose of fentanyl in
his system.Â* By rights, they should have charged his drug dealer with
the murder.

https://rumble.com/vfwdr5-we-are-liv...n-verdict.html



And FWIW, our hero also tested positive for the COVID. Why was this not
labeled a COVID death like all the others?


Also had covid virus. I had noted before that he was probably the only
one to die in the US with covid in his system whose death was not
attributed to covid.