On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 09:46:55 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 12:58:23 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:44:11 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 3:15:19 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:40:46 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 12:02:18 PM UTC-5, rbowman wrote:
On 03/13/2021 05:04 AM, wrote:
You are ill-informed about what the vaccine does. It makes the disease
less severe for the person who has had the vaccine. It makes the
vaccine recipient _less_ contagious.
That's not a great selling point -- you'll still get sick but there is
an 80% chance you won't get as sick. But since you're still susceptible
you'll need to wear one or two masks and keep you distance.

What am I missing?

Nothing, you're just too stupid to comprehend.
What did he say that was stupid?

Keep thinking, maybe you'll figure it out. Probably not though, because you've
posted similar.

If it is a vaccine that doesn't end the masks and lockdowns, what is
it good for?

As usual, now you're trying to move the goal posts. This is what was stated:


Do you read your quotes or do you just pop off insults blindly like
Rod?
Read the 2 quotes above and below this that you cited and tell me
where the goal posts moved?

Before the vaccine we needed to distance and wear a mask, After the
vaccine we need to distance and wear a mask.

"That's not a great selling point -- you'll still get sick but there is
an 80% chance you won't get as sick. But since you're still susceptible
you'll need to wear one or two masks and keep you distance. "


It is the government that says, in
spite of vaccination, we still need to do what they said we were
supposed to be doing last summer, except it is TWO masks now.

With only 10% or so vaccinated and new variants that are even more contagious,
the govt is being cautious. Imagine that. I guess you prefer a president holding
maskless, no social distancing death rallies. It's just a mask. And if the govt said
if you're vaccinated, now you don't need to wear a mask, it's not hard to see the
huge problem it would immediately create. Fifty million Trumptards would try to
go into Walmart maskless, claiming they were already vaccinated. It's just a mask.
So you think we should be wearing masks another year.
I am sure the GOP agrees with you too. It is their best chance of
flipping congress.

Nice, keep making wearing masks a nasty, stupid, divisive issue in the midst of
a pandemic with 550K Americans dead. It's the new GOP way. I see there is a new
public service ad campaign for getting vaccinated. It features every living president
and first lady, except for two people. Can you guess the two? They got vaccinated
privately, won't go on record. So they protected themselves, but screw the trumptards,
let them die instead of showing some leadership. So far what the GOP has flipped
are the WH, House and Senate and they are still following the shyster that achieved
it. So are you.


If we are still locked down in 2020 the democrats will pay for it.
That is all I said. I don't think Biden can print enough money to
change that and some day we are going to pay the price for that too.

Trump added $6 trillion in 4 years, Biden has already added a third of
that in 2 months with promises of much more. It is not a good trend.