wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:44:11 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 3:15:19 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:40:46 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 12:02:18 PM UTC-5, rbowman wrote:
On 03/13/2021 05:04 AM, wrote:
You are ill-informed about what the vaccine does. It makes the
disease
less severe for the person who has had the vaccine. It makes the
vaccine recipient _less_ contagious.
That's not a great selling point -- you'll still get sick but there
is
an 80% chance you won't get as sick. But since you're still
susceptible
you'll need to wear one or two masks and keep you distance.

What am I missing?

Nothing, you're just too stupid to comprehend.
What did he say that was stupid?

Keep thinking, maybe you'll figure it out. Probably not though, because
you've
posted similar.

If it is a vaccine that doesn't end the masks and lockdowns,

It will.

what is it good for?

Radically reduces the effect of the disease and avoids it killing people,
****wit.

It is the government that says, in
spite of vaccination, we still need to do what they said we were
supposed to be doing last summer, except it is TWO masks now.

With only 10% or so vaccinated and new variants that are even more
contagious,
the govt is being cautious. Imagine that. I guess you prefer a
president holding
maskless, no social distancing death rallies. It's just a mask. And if
the govt said
if you're vaccinated, now you don't need to wear a mask, it's not hard to
see the
huge problem it would immediately create. Fifty million Trumptards would
try to
go into Walmart maskless, claiming they were already vaccinated. It's
just a mask.

So you think we should be wearing masks another year.

It wont take a year to vaccinate those willing to be vaccinated.

I am sure the GOP agrees with you too.
It is their best chance of flipping congress.

Completely off with the ****ing fairys, as always.