On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:37:18 +1100, "Rod Speed"
wrote:
wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:32:36 +1100, "Rod Speed"
wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 07:27:58 +1100, "Rod Speed"
wrote:
wrote in message
om...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:51:59 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:
On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 9:45:06 AM UTC-5, Wade Garrett
wrote:
On 2/26/21 9:51 AM, wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2021 at 9:43:15 AM UTC-5, Wade Garrett
wrote:
On 2/26/21 9:27 AM, wrote:
On 2/26/21 9:01 AM, micky wrote:
OT Why $7.50 is enough
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1807595.html
"Republican Senator John Thune has rejected an effort from
congressional
Democrats to raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 an hour
to
$15,
pointing to his $6 or less hourly wages that he earned working
at
a
restaurant as a €œkid€."
Thune graduated from Jones County High School in Murdo, South
Dakota in
1979, when a $6 hourly wage €“ adjusted to modern inflation
rates €“
would
amount to roughly $23 in 2021 dollars.
But he thinks, or he wants you to think, that if he got by on
$6
or
less, people 41 years later should get by on 7.50.
If you don't want minimum wage, don't have minimum skills.
Are you aware that there are people who, no matter how hard they
try,
will never have more than minimum skills? The retarded bagger at
the
grocery store, for example.
Next you'll be bitching that those minimal-skills people are
getting
food stamps because they can't afford to live on minimum wage.
Try not to trip as you step across their dead bodies in the
streets.
Cindy Hamilton
Here's the thing Cindy: Every barrel has a top, a middle and a
bottom.
I know that.
My guess is your rose-colored glasses prevent you from seeing that
bottom and accepting that every barrel has one.
Nope, I can accept that. But I'd rather see the bottom of the barrel
paid enough for their labor to live on, rather than sucking at the
public teat. Apparently you like to see your tax dollars pay for
Welfare.
As Clare pointed out, a high minimum wage just makes a shorter barrel.
Yes.
The top wage will be slow to move as the
bottom wage starts catching up to it.
Yes.
Unless the market can tolerate higher prices the
total cost of labor has to be pretty static.
Thats bull**** when the bulk of the
employees are getting a higher wage.
If prices rise, it eats into that gain
you got from the wage hike.
Duh. And yet Canada works fine with the higher minimum wage.
Clare pointed out the shift manager makes 73 cents more an hour
than the guy who just started this morning. That is not working "fine".
Corse it is for the fast food operation and consumers.
Just not for the employees they were supposed to be helping.
It clearly does help the vast bulk of the employees
as long as the fast food operation continues to be
viable and theirs clearly is just that.
You might as well just stay an expediter and not
bother to move up for a lousy 73 cent raise and
have to deal with running the shift.
That depends on whether you prefer to continue with
the routine drudge work or prefer to run the shift.
Just take the burgers and fries from the warmer,
bag them and hand them to the customer.
Much more boring than running the shift.
Running the shift at a fast food joint is still boring, you just get
yelled at more for stupid stuff the morons you are managing do.
You can be stoned at work and handle that.
Not if they drug test and plenty do now.
You might be better.
Only in the sense that system is designed
so that even the worst droid cant **** up.
Not much of a life tho being a human droid.
That is what minimum wage jobs are. The only reason they exist is
because a machine ends up costing more.
Fast food has been ripe for automation for 30 years. They were just
waiting for a financial incentive. A $15 wage would do it. You could
easily see the staff cut in half just by adding a couple of machines.
They have already lost 2 cashiers in most of the McDonalds by using
self order kiosks and phone paid drive through orders. Once they start
adding more automation to the food prep, staff will fall fast.