On 2/21/2021 5:19 PM, Fredxx wrote:
On 21/02/2021 22:46, Muggles wrote:
On 2/21/2021 3:33 PM, Fredxx wrote:
On 21/02/2021 18:35, Rod Speed wrote:

reams of your **** flushed where it belongs


You seem to hate them sufficiently where you would like to remove the
choice between an abortion and saving a woman's life vs the alternative.


The majority of the time women have a choice to have sex or not.Â* When
they choose to have sex, they should also take responsibility for the
aftermath.Â* Pregnancy is a well-known result of sex, so for her to
kill an innocent child, she commits murder by taking the life of
another innocent human being.

That's without the mental health aspects of carrying a baby after a
rape to full term.

Pregnancy from rape removes the premise of choice to have sex.Â* When
force removes ones choice to risk conception, the woman STILL has a
choice to save a life of an innocent child or to kill an innocent child.

Killing innocent children is still murder, although many people
believe in justifiable homicide.Â* Are you one of those who opt for the
latter?


That's a very big leap. I have already said I do not condone murder. Why
you would think so is beyond any reasonable person's comprehension.

You have repeatedly stated you approve of women killing their babies
because they should have control of their own bodies, yet, you have not
approached the idea that those same women are ignoring their own
participation in creating a child. Why should women get off the hook
and be allowed to kill an innocent child when they are responsible for
conceiving that child by willingly participating in said sexual activity?


It's an issue many people grapple with when it comes to pregnancy from
a rape.

Quite, which where abortion comes to the rescue of the victim.

A child is not responsible for how they were conceived, so why do you
condone killing an innocent child because of how it was conceived?


Snip this again before your response and it will show what a sadistic
monster you really are.

Sadistic monsters usually fall on the side of those who kill innocent
children.



Rod is a prime example of someone who hates women sufficiently to make
them, after rape, carry the resulting pregnancy to full term, make them
suffer childbirth and then expect them to give the child away, through
no fault of their own.


This issue is not about Rod and his views on rape or even abortion.

Explain your own reasoning and approval of it. You seem to think
condoning abortion somehow makes it right JUST because the circumstances
of conception were not ideal for the mother. Your reasoning is flawed,
and since I've read many of your posts arguing in favor of abortion, I
have to wonder if you've even taken into consideration the child who is
completely innocent.

Sure, women have a larger cross to bare when they conceive for any
reason, but at the same time abortion still kills innocent children who
did not ask to be killed for something they had no guilt in creating.


--
Maggie