"Max Demian" wrote in message
...
On 20/02/2021 22:53, Rod Speed wrote:
"Joel" wrote in message
...
Fredxx wrote:

It is not sexist for laws to be created from the opinion or both men
and
women. Have you not heard of suffrage? Anything else is the very
definition of sexism.

The woman is allowed to take his opinion into account, but it's
ultimately her decision alone.

I agree, but can we agree it's not sexist for parliament [1] stipulate
the terms of an abortion.

[1] where so it happens MPs are voted in by a majority of women (in the
electorate and likelihood of voting).


Only where it deals with restrictions on late term abortions, where
the baby may be viable - it's reasonable to prohibit elective
abortions in that period, but to protect the mother's health or life,
or in cases where the baby will be severely deformed at birth, it
should be allowed.

Why not after it is born ?

Good idea as it avoids procedures such as amniocentesis that may endanger
mother and foetus. See what comes out and decide whether we want it to
live.

Same with those with severe disabilitys like autism that
show up later in life. Lethal injection for them too, eh ?

The difference between a late abortion and infanticide is birth, which is
an event *in* life, not its start.

Both are still murder. For some odd reason we ban murder.