On 09/02/2021 15:21, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:40:07 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 09/02/2021 13:36, jon wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:18:07 +0000, Jethro_uk wrote:

On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:04:40 +0000, jon wrote:

On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:53:13 +0000, Andrew wrote:

On 09/02/2021 12:03, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
... is barely mentioned (-17°C)

Now if it had been the warmest...


It's always cold in the Scottish Highlands !!

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather...st/gfkgdgj2j#?
date=2021-02-09


What we want is a nice re-activated volcano in the lake district, we
could tap it for energy.

Weren't they playing with geothermal energy up in the NE a few years
ago ?

Many seem to have dabbled, but no headline news yet.

If it made remote economic sense it would have been done years ago.
waiting for government subsidies

I think the danger is that you end up - like Iceland - providing it to
everyone at very low prices. And we all know that just isn't how we like
to do things in England.

No, that isn't the danger.

Iceland has a low population and active volcanoes.

geothermal simply doesn't work here.

I think the pipes from Battersea power station to all those council
flats still exist...that was free energy...

But the greens have ensured that London has no power stations left. Not
even waste burners.



--
Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.