View Single Post
  #62   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
micky micky is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,340
Default OT: COVID-19 CONVALESCENT PLASMA FOR TREATMENT OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:46:59 +0000, Bod
wrote:

On 05/02/2021 16:58, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 10:49 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 11:41:02 AM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 10:28 AM, Bob F wrote:
On 2/5/2021 8:22 AM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 10:16 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/5/2021 10:44 AM, Muggles wrote:


*WHAT IS COVID-19 CONVALESCENT PLASMA?*

The blood from people who recover from COVID-19 contains
substances called antibodies, which are capable of fighting the
virus that causes the illness. For some other diseases caused by
respiratory viruses, giving people the liquid portion of blood
that contains these antibodies, called plasma, obtained from those
who have recovered from the virus, may lead to more rapid
improvement of the disease. Patients with COVID-19 may improve
faster if they receive plasma from those who have recovered from
COVID-19, because it may have the ability to fight the virus that
causes COVID-19.


*HOW IS COVID-19 CONVALESCENT PLASMA GIVEN?*

You will be given plasma, the liquid portion of the blood, from a
person who has recovered from COVID-19. It will be given into one
of your veins, using a sterile single use needle, and will be
given over the course of up to about one to two hours.
Approximately 200 mL (a little less than 8 ounces) of plasma will
be given in an initial infusion. Additional infusions of plasma
may occur throughout your hospital stay if the treating physician
determines that additional treatments are clinically justified.


{more}
https://www.fda.gov/media/141479/dow...s%20COVID%2D19.



Sounds interesting, thanks.


Do you know anyone who has recovered from covid and then donated
plasma with antibodies?


Yes, one fellow had donated at least twice that I'm aware of.


That's great! That will provide people with antibodies which is the
main method of our bodies fighting off viruses.



Keep researching. Maybe you will find out about a new invention.
Something call a vaccination, that gets your body to create it's own
antibodies, so you don't have to wait until you get covid, and get it
from other people to be able to fight disease.

And there is another brilliant invention, called a "mask", that helps
reduce disease from passing from an infected person to someone else.
Look it up, you might learn something.
Masks don't prevent anyone from catching a virus, and there's NO PROOF
they help.



Another big lie repeated.


Nope ... do provide verifiable proof that masks prevent people from
catching viruses.

They even come with disclaimers that says there are NOT for
medical use. Additionally, masks cause many people to get sick! You
seem to think masks should be the main prevention, but they don't do
squat.



You seem incapable of being educated.* I never said or implied in any way
that masks should be the main prevention method.** It's one tool among
many.


I guess you simply ignore the disclaimers that come on the masks you
purchase.



They obviously are obviously just covering their backs.


Absolutely. If they promised that they worked, or even said they worked
well, and someone got sick, they'd be sued.

Muggles should read the release anyone getting convalescent plasma is
expected to sign. In fact what anyone getting any medical treatement
is expected to sign. It's longer and stronger than the disclaimer on the
masks. But she signs it every time she has a procedure.

Then there are laws that limit tremendously when a doctor is liable. She
doesn't even have to sign anything. He has to be in violation of
standard medical standards. Just being wrong and prescribing a drug
that gives slight side effects is not going to get you much of a
judgment if any. He has to be negligent.


My brother heard of a case where parents brought in a child for an x-ray
of some fancy imaging procedure and he was a baby or somehow couldn't
keep still so he needed sedation. The doctor asked the assistant how
much to use and she said, At my old job we used nnnn. And so they did
and they killed the child. It was negligence to depend on someone not a
a doctor and not looking at an accepted reference when she said it, to
depend on her for this information. And I'm sure he lost big in a
lawsuit.